<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 12px; font-family: Consolas, sans-serif;">
<span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">
<blockquote id="MAC_OUTLOOK_ATTRIBUTION_BLOCKQUOTE" style="BORDER-LEFT: #b5c4df 5 solid; PADDING:0 0 0 5; MARGIN:0 0 0 5;">
<div>
<div>
<div>Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 03:49:22PM -0600, Brandon Ewing:</div>
<blockquote id="MAC_OUTLOOK_ATTRIBUTION_BLOCKQUOTE" style="BORDER-LEFT: #b5c4df 5 solid; PADDING:0 0 0 5; MARGIN:0 0 0 5;">
<div>On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 06:23:53PM +0000, heasley wrote:</div>
<div>> </div>
<div>> Yes, the idea seems fine to me. I'll add it for rancid 4.0.</div>
<div>> </div>
<div></div>
<div>An option to set the author would make git blame more fun</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>the author, of the commit, should be the rancid user :) and, rancid-cvs</div>
<div>sets:</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div> git config user.name RANCiD</div>
<div> git config user.email $USER$MAILDOMAIN</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</span>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>yes I was thinking about this too but in our case we detect change by users not being valid svn/git users. So we just write the username inside the commit message and leave the repository to a single user: rancid. </div>
</body>
</html>