meeting

[Joel M. Halpern]

Given that I have recently seen indications that a number of significant 
service providers already have this capability, the question is:
1) Is it used by the customers of those providers much
2) Is it actually helping to reduce the amount of advertisements that those 
providers which have it produce.

To put this another way, we already have the running code out there, and it 
would be nice to know if it is producing the desired result before we start 
working on encouraging more people to use it.

Thank you,
Joel M. Halpern

At 04:46 AM 11/22/01 -0800, Randy Bush wrote:
> > Following on from the August WG meeting, I would like to pass
> > draft-huston-nopeer-00.txt to the WG to be adopted as a WG item.
>
>this initiates a two week wg call on whether this work should become
>draft-ietf-ptomaine-nopeer-...
>
> > Does it need consideration in the WG meeting?
>
>i think the technical details are worth some back and forth.  there are
>subtle alternative semantics, yes?
>
>so, so far, our agenda would be
>   o agenda bashing
>   o discussion of draft-huston-nopeer-00.txt
>   o administrivia
>     - [how] do we proceed?
>     - any charter changes?
>     - new chair
>
>more documents needed!
>
>randy