who doesn't aggregate? (fwd)

[Philip Smith]

Yes, that is correct, Mark. I've basically taken /20 as the minimum 
allocation size, which is a start, but not very accurate. I'll tidy this up 
to take account of reality as soon as I can...

philip
--

At 14:35 05/10/2001 +0930, Mark Prior wrote:
>At 12:07 PM -0700 4/10/01, abha wrote:
>>For those of you not on NANOG...  this may be of interest....
>This big problem with Phillip's list is that it doesn't take into account 
>that the AUNIC assignments (which are now back with APNIC) are largely 
>swamp like in nature (ie a /24 was the smallest block assigned and it is 
>treated as PI space). This means that a number of the wholesale ISPs in 
>Australia are much higher up this list than they should be.
>
>Mark.
>--