Last Call: NOPEER community for BGP route scope control to BCP
Pekka Savola
pekkas at netcore.fi
Thu Nov 7 19:46:40 UTC 2002
On 7 Nov 2002, Justin Fletcher wrote:
> > The IESG has received a request from the Prefix Taxonomy Ongoing
> > Measurement & Inter Network Experiment Working Group to consider NOPEER
> > community for BGP route scope control
> > <draft-ietf-ptomaine-nopeer-00.txt> as a BCP.
> >
> > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> > final comments on this action. Please send any comments to the
> > iesg at ietf.org or ietf at ietf.org mailing lists by 2002-11-17.
>
> I believe this should be considered as an experimental rather than a
> BCP. It does not document current practice and requires implementation
> by router vendors before it can be adopted into practice.
Actually, I don't think this requires _anything_ from router vendors.
Taking this into use is, of course, a bit easier if there's something in
the routers, but I believe the "promise" of the mechanism is just to
specify how to use a new well-known community.
Well, seeing that there are different assumptions on this, I believe text
should be clarified a bit (one way or the other).
> Other issues:
>
> The community field should be previously assigned by IANA and defined in
> the document.
>
> There's a large motivation section, but no implementation
> section (what do I do with NOPEER if receive it?)
Do you think example route-map statements are necessary?
> The paragraph
>
> This approach allows an originator of a prefix to attach a commonly
> defined policy to a route prefix, indicate that a route should be
> re-advertised conditionally, based on the characteristics of the
> inter-AS connection.
>
> does not define the conditions under which a route should be
> re-advertised. Without such, I don't see a difference between
> NOPEER and NO-ADVERTISE.
A route-map is quite an explicit condition.
> There should at least be references to RFC1771 and RFC1997.
Agreed.
> I'd like a clear definition of "bilateral inter-AS peering"
> early in the document.
Agreed.
--
Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted,
Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall"
Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords
More information about the Ptomaine
mailing list