[rancid] Re: "svn warning - <router> is already under version control" message while running the rancid-run -r <router>
Atle.Ostbo at tdcsong.no
Mon Dec 11 09:06:01 UTC 2006
>>I think you should be asking yourself why this so slow. Is your system's
>>directly cache too small? Disk performance problems? Is there contention
>>for locks on the svn database?
I am running an DELL server with the following configuration:
Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 3.00GHz
Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 3.00GHz, 3000
1024348 kB RAM
2097144 kB swap space
Operating System.....: Linux version 2.6.9-42.0.3.ELsmp (brewbuilder at hs20-bc2-2.build.redhat.com) (gcc version 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-3)) #1 SMP Mon Sep 25 17:24:31 EDT 2006
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
4128448 511596 3407140 14% /
/dev/sda3 194449 25871 158538 15% /boot
none 512172 0 512172 0% /dev/shm
4128448 51048 3867688 2% /home
4128448 50924 3867812 2% /tmp
8256952 5071532 2765992 65% /usr
4128448 239204 3679532 7% /var
You write something about the system's cache size, could you please come with more info on that (- how to checkout + and fix) ?
>> Is there contention for locks on the svn database?
What did you mean ? - I don't know.
>>You might also ask yourself if 5000 devices in a single group is a good
>>design. Seems like that would produce rather overwhelming diffs.
Yes, I need the all config backup's in the same group. It's only 5000 files - I have read about subversion server with more that 30000 files, so I don't se any performance problem with that.
Med vennlig hilsen/Best regards
> -----Original Message-----
> From: john heasley [mailto:heas at shrubbery.net]
> Sent: 9. desember 2006 03:32
> To: Atle Østbø
> Cc: john heasley; rancid-discuss at shrubbery.net
> Subject: Re: "svn warning - <router> is already under version
> control" message while running the rancid-run -r <router>
> Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:54:10AM +0100, Atle ?stb?:
> > Hi
> > I have try to use rancid to take care of the configuration
> changes for our routers.
> > I export an node list from our HP OpenView NNM and build an
> list of over 5000 cisco routers.
> > The rancid starting: Tue Dec 5 23:00:01 CET 2006 - and was
> finish: ending: Thu Dec 7 05:22:23 CET 2006
> > It's take a long time to build the svn repository - it use
> nearly 24 hours to do that. I don't know why this take so longe time.
> I think you should be asking yourself why this so slow. Is
> your system's
> directly cache too small? Disk performance problems? Is
> there contention
> for locks on the svn database?
> You might also ask yourself if 5000 devices in a single group
> is a good
> design. Seems like that would produce rather overwhelming diffs.
> > Is there any way to perform the rancid to get config from
> one router without check in all of them, only get the new
> config from the -r <router> ?
> Not with the current code.
More information about the Rancid-discuss