[rancid] Re: Adding version tags into CVS/config files
Lance Vermilion
rancid at gheek.net
Tue Sep 26 08:46:26 UTC 2006
Hey all,
Anyone got an idea why this is happening?
I have this script that I was talking about working if I run it with rancid-run -r <device>.
If I run it with rancid-run and let it spin through the devices in the devicelist I end up with the following errors.
Trying to get all of the configs.
File: /apps/rancid/var/../bin//apps/rancid/cssrancid not able to be opened:No such file or directory
File: /apps/rancid/var/../bin//apps/rancid/rancid not able to be opened:No such file or directory
When running it as rancid-run -r <device> the directory to the file is just fine.
Below is the code I added.
*** home/backup/rancid.orig 2006-09-26 01:44:19.000000000 -0700
--- bin/rancid 2006-09-26 00:49:32.000000000 -0700
*************** if (defined($ENV{"ACLSORT"}) && $ENV{"AC
*** 1823,1829 ****
--- 1823,1865 ----
$aclsort = "";
}
+
+ # Print Script Versions
+ # This will print out the versions of the scripts
+ # that are the core of rancid and the version of
+ # this script.
+ sub PrintScriptVersions()
+ {
+ if (defined($ENV{"PSV"}) && $ENV{"PSV"} =~ /yes/i)
+ {
+ my @files = ('rancid-fe', 'rancid-run', 'control_rancid', 'par', 'clogin', __FILE__);
+ my $File = '';
+ for $File (@files)
+ {
+ $File =~ s/bin\///g;
+ $File = $ENV{"BASEDIR"} . '/../bin/' . $File;
+ open(FILE, "$File") or warn "File: $File not able to be opened:$!\n";
+ while (<FILE>)
+ {
+ if ( /^##\s\$Id:\s(.*)\s(\d+){4}\/.*\sExp\s\$$/ )
+ {
+ my ($script, $version) = split(/,/, $1);
+ chomp ($version, $script);
+ ProcessHistory("","","","!RANCID-SCRIPT-TYPE: [$script ($version)]\n");
+ }
+ }
+ close (FILE);
+ }
+ ProcessHistory("","","","!\n");
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ ProcessHistory("","","","!\n");
+ }
+ }
+
ProcessHistory("","","","!RANCID-CONTENT-TYPE: cisco\n");
+ PrintScriptVersions();
ProcessHistory("COMMENTS","keysort","B0","!\n");
ProcessHistory("COMMENTS","keysort","D0","!\n");
ProcessHistory("COMMENTS","keysort","F0","!\n");
--
-Lance <rancid at gheek.net>
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 05:31:09PM -0700, john heasley wrote:
> Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 02:39:00PM -0700, Lance Vermilion:
> > John,
> >
> > Are you saying that @VERSION@ will return the version of rancid?
>
> It should be replaced by autoconf with the release version, coming from
> include/version.h.in.
>
> > I am interested in knowing what the other core script versions are as well.
> > Where is the @VERSION@ variable stored?
> > Are the values in VERSION $Id: scriptname,v version?
> >
> > --
> >
> > -Lance <lance at gheek.net>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 02:27:13PM -0700, john heasley wrote:
> > > To me, the more interesting bit is just the release, not the CVS revision.
> > > That is simple as replacing @VERSION at . Also, hpuifilter -v will report
> > > the version.
> > >
> > > Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 05:00:28PM -0400, Burton Windle:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Lance Vermilion wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hey all,
> > > > >
> > > > > I have seen the question "What version of (rancid/clogin/etc) am I
> > > > > running?" come up a few different times. I know that each script has its
> > > > > own version etc. It would be nice to have something like what is below
> > > > > add at the top of each config. This would make it extremely clear what
> > > > > was used to collect the configs and what versions are being used.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Speaking from experience as one of those people who has recently asked
> > > > that same question...
> > > >
> > > > I checked the rancid script for a -v, -V, or --version argument first,
> > > > then went searching the text of the script for a (non-CVS) version. I
> > > > never thought of checking the CVS repo for the RANCID version; having an
> > > > argument to the program (or in this case, the script) and have it spit out
> > > > the version would be, IMHO, very handy (and more in-line with other Unixy
> > > > apps, so more likey to be stumbled upon by the typical admin).
> > > >
> > > > Having to dig in the CVS repo is, I would think, unlikey to get found
> > > > without some handholding, be it FAQ or list.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Burton Windle bwindle at fint.org
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Rancid-discuss mailing list
> > > > Rancid-discuss at shrubbery.net
> > > > http://www.shrubbery.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rancid-discuss
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Rancid-discuss mailing list
> > > Rancid-discuss at shrubbery.net
> > > http://www.shrubbery.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rancid-discuss
> >
More information about the Rancid-discuss
mailing list