[rancid] Email Question

Mack, David A (Dave) dmack at verizon.com
Fri Aug 19 17:50:49 UTC 2011

Adam, John,
	Thanks to you both for your responses. I too can see the pros and cons of both approaches. Being a very small team, /dev/null is the path of least resistance.


David A. Mack                                            (703) 886-2661 (W)
CCIE #6963 (Sec, SP OPS, SP and R&S) JNCIE-M #399 CISSP  (703) 431-7617 (C)
email:  dmack at verizon.com
"We are now the knights who say... Ping!"

-----Original Message-----
From: Adam Korab [mailto:adam.korab at gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2011 1:46 PM
To: Mack, David A (Dave)
Cc: john heasley; rancid-discuss at shrubbery.net
Subject: Re: [rancid] Email Question

On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Mack, David A (Dave)
<dmack at verizon.com> wrote:
> Adam,
>        Check! That is exactly what I will do.

Been there, done that. ;-)

And thus, the great philsophical debate of whether you put an Exchange
DL as the target in /etc/aliases and control the user distribution at
Exchange, or add the individual user accounts to the localhost


More information about the Rancid-discuss mailing list