[rancid] Cisco 10k sflog Timestamp Cycling
Kenneth Lind
lind108 at hotmail.com
Fri Jun 13 16:26:19 UTC 2014
> -----Original Message-----
> From: heasley [mailto:heas at shrubbery.net]
> Sent: Friday, June 13, 2014 2:05 AM
> To: Kenneth Lind
> Cc: 'heasley'; rancid-discuss at shrubbery.net
> Subject: Re: [rancid] Cisco 10k sflog Timestamp Cycling
>
> Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 10:18:21AM -0400, Kenneth Lind:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: heasley [mailto:heas at shrubbery.net]
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 5:27 PM
> > > To: Kenneth Lind
> > > Cc: rancid-discuss at shrubbery.net
> > > Subject: Re: [rancid] Cisco 10k sflog Timestamp Cycling
> > >
> > > Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 02:24:41PM -0400, Kenneth Lind:
> > > > This is a fairly old issue so I'm including the previous threads
> > > > for what it's worth. We upgraded to Rancid v3.0 and then today to
> > > > v3.1
> > > without issue.
> > > > The upgrade to 3.0a did hush the actual sflog diffs, however, we
> > > > are still receiving noisy diffs related to the sflog/IPDR data
> and
> > > > the fact that n bytes are stored in flash before being sent to
> the
> > > collector.
> > > >
> > > > What would be the best method to hush these diffs?
> > > >
> > > > Example of diffs:
> > > > !Flash: sflog
> > > > - !Flash: 821772288 bytes available (202817536 bytes used)
> > > > + !Flash: 821805056 bytes available (202784768 bytes used)
> > >
> > > would you show me the output of the command 'dir' or 'show flash'
> > > for whatever device this is? it should be replacing that line with
> > > a sumarry line that ought to be less annoying.
> >
> > "Dir" and "show flash" look a little different, so I'll include both.
> >
> > First "dir"
> > Directory of disk0:/
> >
> > 1 -rw- 68483912 Dec 14 2010 10:46:02 -05:00 <removed>.bin
> > 2 -rw- 68495176 Jan 25 2011 01:27:54 -05:00 <removed>.bin
> > 3 -rw- 54584320 Jan 25 2011 01:30:40 -05:00 <removed>.pkg
> > 4 -rw- 11060935 Jul 31 2012 10:09:38 -04:00 <removed>.img
> > 5 -rw- 115639 Mar 28 2013 10:24:54 -04:00 ftp
> > 6 -rw- 0 Jun 9 2014 10:01:30 -04:00 sflog
> >
> >
> > "show flash"
> > -#- --length-- -----date/time------ path
> > 1 68483912 Dec 14 2010 10:46:02 -05:00 <removed>.bin
> > 2 68495176 Jan 25 2011 01:27:54 -05:00 <removed>.bin
> > 3 54584320 Jan 25 2011 01:30:40 -05:00 <removed>.pkg
> > 4 11060935 Jul 31 2012 10:09:38 -04:00 <removed>.img
> > 5 115639 Mar 28 2013 10:24:54 -04:00 ftp
> > 6 0 Jun 9 2014 10:01:30 -04:00 sflog
> >
>
> Does this patch fix the space available line (summarize it)?
>
> Index: lib/ios.pm.in
> ===================================================================
> --- lib/ios.pm.in (revision 2847)
> +++ lib/ios.pm.in (working copy)
> @@ -848,6 +848,20 @@
> # Drop these files entirely.
> /\s+(private-multiple-fs|multiple-fs|LISP-MapCache-
> IPv\S+|nv_hdr)$/ &&
> next;
> +
> + if ($ios eq "XE" && /(\d+) bytes available \(\d+ bytes used\)/) {
> + my($tmp) = $1;
> + if ($tmp >= (1024 * 1024 * 1024)) {
> + $tmp = int($tmp / (1024 * 1024 * 1024));
> + $_ = "$tmp GB free";
> + } elsif ($tmp >= (1024 * 1024)) {
> + $tmp = int($tmp / (1024 * 1024));
> + $_ = "$tmp MB free";
> + } else {
> + $tmp = int($tmp / 1024);
> + $_ = "$tmp KB free";
> + }
> + }
> ProcessHistory("FLASH","","","!Flash: $_");
> }
> ProcessHistory("","","","!\n");
Am I doing that wrong if I put that in ios.pm? Doing so caused quite a few
errors in the logs.
More information about the Rancid-discuss
mailing list