[rancid] Cisco 2504

[Daniel Shields]

Thanks Heasley!  I went ahead and updated the work server to 3.1.99 and the 2504s are integrated.  Not seeing any issues here.

> Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 17:49:12 +0000
> From: heas at shrubbery.net
> To: grungelizard9 at hotmail.com
> CC: heas at shrubbery.net; antonio.quesada at usan.com; rancid-discuss at shrubbery.net
> Subject: Re: [rancid] Cisco 2504
> 
> Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 12:40:59PM -0500, Daniel Shields:
> > Thanks Heasley.  Would I be able to bring the device types into version 3.1?  This is a production box at work, so I need to be sure it's stable.  Sould be able to test 3.2 on another box though.  Thanks!
> 
> I think that will work just fine.
> 
> > > Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 17:33:35 +0000
> > > From: heas at shrubbery.net
> > > To: grungelizard9 at hotmail.com
> > > CC: heas at shrubbery.net; antonio.quesada at usan.com; rancid-discuss at shrubbery.net
> > > Subject: Re: [rancid] Cisco 2504
> > > 
> > > Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 12:28:32PM -0500, Daniel Shields:
> > > > Apologies for the confusion.  These are the WLCs.  Thanks Antonio.
> > > > Heas, I'm running RANCID 3.1 right now.  3.2 has support for the WLC's?  Thanks!
> > > 
> > > Yes, I imported one of the versions floating (sorry dont recall which exactly)
> > > and with Daniel Schmidt's help cleaned it up a bit to make it more reliable.
> > > 
> > > 3.2 is still alpha, but i think the issues will be unnoticed.
> >  		 	   		  

 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.shrubbery.net/pipermail/rancid-discuss/attachments/20150305/37eb3323/attachment.html>