[rancid] Rancid and Cisco Small Business SG500

[Richard Savage]

Hi All

Im using rancid 2.3.8 and am backup up around 100 cisco small business switches SG300's and SG500's.  Im using the type cisco-sb.

When backing up the SG500's on every diff the following is coming up:

Index: configs/rc-pr-sw1
===================================================================
- -- configs/rc-pr-sw1     (revision 1333)
@@ -16,12 +16,12 @@
  !---- ------------------------- -------------------------
  ! 1              24                        OK
  ! 2              23                        OK
- ! 3              24                        OK
+ ! 3              22                        OK
  !Unit     Up time
  !---- ---------------
- ! 1     06,07:16:42
- ! 2     06,07:16:46
- ! 3     06,07:16:42
+ ! 1     06,13:16:41
+ ! 2     06,13:16:45
+ ! 3     06,13:16:41
  !
  !       Unit             SW version         Boot version         HW version
  !------------------- ------------------- ------------------- -------------------

Is there a way that rancid can ignore this so that we don't get a diff everytime rancid is run?

Many thanks

Rich
This e-mail is sent on behalf of Timico Partner Services Limited, a company registered in England and Wales, registered number 03128506, registered office Beacon Hill Park, Newark, Nottinghamshire, NG24 2TN and regulated by Ofcom. The information in this e-mail is confidential and is intended solely for the use of that individual or entity to which it is addressed. Unauthorised use, dissemination, distribution, publication or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you receive this in error, please notify us by email to privacy at timico.co.uk<mailto:privacy at timico.co.uk> and delete any copies. For information about how we process data and monitor communications please see our privacy statement<http://www.timico.co.uk/downloads/terms/Privacy_Statement.pdf>.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.shrubbery.net/pipermail/rancid-discuss/attachments/20160413/a29b1f93/attachment.html>