[rancid] Fortigate additional tweaks and device filters

heasley heas at shrubbery.net
Fri Aug 3 20:08:51 UTC 2018


Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 03:34:05PM +0000, Nick Nauwelaerts:
> i guess the fortinet module could use some polishing. it does a great job for getting a complete running config backup. but other information could certainly be welcome to.
> 
> perhaps i'll have a look at converting it to a library later on, then you can just comment out the modules you have no interest in. but that will have to wait until i get aerohive hiveos polished a bit.

i'll convert it, but someone needs to commit to testing it for me, since i
have none of these devices.

> // nick
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rancid-discuss [mailto:rancid-discuss-bounces at shrubbery.net] On Behalf Of heasley
> Sent: Friday, August 3, 2018 00:16
> To: Chris Wopat <me at falz.net>
> Cc: rancid-discuss at shrubbery.net
> Subject: Re: [rancid] Fortigate additional tweaks and device filters
> 
> Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 09:25:30AM -0500, Chris Wopat:
> > > Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 08:37:03AM +0000, Nick Nauwelaerts:
> > >> hm,
> > >> i actually like to have those versions in the output. if something breaks my first reaction tends to be: "what changed?", and rancid is usually the first place i check.
> > >>
> > >> would it be an option to control this with FILTER_OSC , even though its not quite it's intended application?
> > > Could be; what are they?  version stamp of what exactly?
> > >
> >
> >
> > My additions to filter are based on the fact that there's already a
> > block of these being filtered, this is just 'more of the same' chatty
> > stuff that changes daily.
> >
> > I'd say go one way or another- add more similar filters (my suggestion)
> > or do none or have a toggle-able option. FILTER_OSC sounds more like
> > it's for security stuff, so that doesn't seem like the best fit to me.
> >
> > Has a new FILTER_CRUFT type of option been discussed in the past? Unsure
> > if this fits the category of any other previously discussed things.
> 
> it was intended for stuff that oscillated but is still desirable (by some).
> so, seems to fit the application, perhaps for the other similar filters.
> again, i dont know the platform, so I need input.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Rancid-discuss mailing list
> Rancid-discuss at shrubbery.net
> http://www.shrubbery.net/mailman/listinfo/rancid-discuss
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> Volg Aquafin op Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/AquafinNV> | Twitter<https://twitter.com/aquafinnv> | YouTube<http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCk_4P5BJ-MtEEDCkCsR_KqQ?feature=mhee> | LinkedIN<http://www.linkedin.com/company/aquafin/products>
> 
> In het kader van de uitoefening van onze taken verzamelen we bij Aquafin persoonsgegevens. Hoe we omgaan met deze gegevens en wat de rechten van de betrokkenen zijn, kan je nalezen in onze privacy policy<https://www.aquafin.be/nl-be/privacy-policy>.
> 
> [https://www.aquafin.be/sites/aquafin/files/styles/paragraph_with_caption/public/2018-06/email_banner_web.jpg]<https://www.aquafin.be/>
>   P Denk aan het milieu. Druk deze mail niet onnodig af.



More information about the Rancid-discuss mailing list