[rancid] [SPAM?] Cisco NX "chatty" with Power info
FF
fusionfoto at gmail.com
Mon Jul 1 20:01:18 UTC 2019
Hi,
So I haven't messed with FILTER_OSC yet..
I would be glad to drop the power monitoring dialogue, except it seems to
be the only one I've identified that tells me if a power supply has failed
or if we are running in redundant power supply mode.
That's the real challenge. On other platforms, Cisco has an option where
you can just get an "OK" instead of all the hoopla.
I need to see if I can embed a grep or the "| exclude" in the actual
command sent to the N9K to resolve this. The erroneous chatter is a shame.
Maybe there is a way to add it to the definition for FILTER_OSC.
Thanks!
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 4:57 PM Piegorsch, Weylin William <weylin at bu.edu>
wrote:
> Have you tied playing with FILTER_OSC? I haven't, I've just lived with
> this output, but I remember similar conversations on this topic in the past.
>
>
>
> And you’re right – NX-OS a while ago (2012-ish) didn’t have this issue; it
> was a software update somewhere around 18months ago (30 months ago?) that I
> started noticing it.
>
>
>
> weylin
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Vacheslav Zouhairy <m_zouhairy at skno.by>
> *Sent:* Friday, June 28, 2019 1:13 AM
> *To:* rancid-discuss at shrubbery.net
> *Subject:* Re: [rancid] [SPAM?] Cisco NX "chatty" with Power info
>
>
>
> hmm i have almost the same hardware but your software is a bit newer, but
> i do not get that in the output. it seems you will have to see what command
> produces the offending output and tweak the nxos template not to run that
> command
>
>
>
> On Thu, 2019-06-27 at 11:14 -0400, FF wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Thanks for responding..
>
>
>
> This is:
>
>
>
> Software
> BIOS: version 07.59
> NXOS: version 7.0(3)I7(3)
> BIOS compile time: 08/26/2016
> NXOS image file is: bootflash:///nxos.7.0.3.I7.3.bin
> NXOS compile time: 2/12/2018 13:00:00 [02/12/2018 19:13:48]
>
>
> Hardware
> cisco Nexus9000 C93120TX Chassis
> Intel(R) Core(TM) i3- CPU @ 2.50GHz with 16400992 kB of memory.
>
>
>
> Thanks for your help!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 5:01 AM Vacheslav Zouhairy <m_zouhairy at skno.by>
> wrote:
>
> what model of nexus is this?
>
>
>
> On Thu, 2019-06-27 at 00:07 -0400, FF wrote:
>
>
>
> ok,
>
>
>
> So upgraded to 3.9 with the same behavior.
>
>
>
> Built a cisco-nxp personality that had an | exclude OK line on it to
> remove the wattage line... but suddenly rancid couldn't log in to those
> units.
>
> Even though clogin would work fine. Went and modified the cisco-nx
> definition... but the exclude is ignored.
>
>
>
> So now 2.3 and 3.9 behave identically in this situation...
>
>
>
> This is the whole output for the section in question:
>
>
>
> Index: configs/10.10.10.114
>
> ===================================================================
>
> retrieving revision 1.1157
>
> diff -u -4 -r1.1157 10.10.10.114
>
> @@ -80,10 +80,10 @@
>
> !Env: Power Actual Total
>
> !Env: Supply Model Input Capacity Status
>
> !Env: (Watts ) (Watts )
>
> !Env: ------- ---------- --------------- ------ ----------
> --------------------
>
> - !Env: 1 N9K-PAC-1200W-B 192 W 1200
> W Ok
>
> - !Env: 2 N9K-PAC-1200W-B 174 W 1200
> W Ok
>
> + !Env: 1 N9K-PAC-1200W-B 190 W 1200
> W Ok
>
> + !Env: 2 N9K-PAC-1200W-B 176 W 1200
> W Ok
>
> !Env: Power Usage Summary:
>
> !Env: --------------------
>
> !Env: Power Supply redundancy mode (configured)
> PS-Redundant
>
> !Env: Power Supply redundancy mode (operational)
> PS-Redundant
>
>
>
> Any suggestions?
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 5:02 PM FF <fusionfoto at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Apparently I'm running a massively old version (2.3.8). I'll try upgrading
> to 3.9 first.
>
>
>
> thanks in advance
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 4:47 PM heasley <heas at shrubbery.net> wrote:
>
> Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 07:06:45PM +0000, Nick Nauwelaerts:
> > what version of rancid & nx-os are you running?
>
> good question.
>
> if the answer is 3.9, please show us the complete output of show
> environment power
>
> > i notice you only have 1 column less as me, you seem to miss "actual
> output".
> >
> >
> > // nick
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Rancid-discuss [mailto:rancid-discuss-bounces at shrubbery.net] On
> Behalf Of FF
> > Sent: Friday, March 8, 2019 18:05
> > To: rancid-discuss at shrubbery.net
> > Subject: [SPAM?] [rancid] Cisco NX "chatty" with Power info
> >
> >
> > !Env: Power Actual Total
> >
> > !Env: Supply Model Input Capacity
> Status
> >
> > !Env: (Watts ) (Watts )
> >
> > !Env: ------- ---------- --------------- ------ ----------
> --------------------
> >
> > - !Env: 1 N9K-PAC-1200W-B 180 W 1200 W
> Ok
> >
> > + !Env: 1 N9K-PAC-1200W-B 182 W 1200 W
> Ok
> >
> > !Env: 2 N9K-PAC-1200W-B 162 W 1200 W
> Ok
> >
> > !Env: Power Usage Summary:
> >
> > Every time Rancid runs, we get erroneous reports because the power usage
> fluctuates by 1-2 watts per run. Any suggestions on how to keep the good
> information (availability, etc) without getting this level of detail?
> >
> > thanks in advance!
> >
> >
> > --
> > FF
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > Volg Aquafin op Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/AquafinNV> | Twitter<
> https://twitter.com/aquafinnv> | YouTube<
> http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCk_4P5BJ-MtEEDCkCsR_KqQ?feature=mhee> |
> LinkedIN<http://www.linkedin.com/company/aquafin/products> | Instagram<
> https://www.instagram.com/aquafin_nv/>
> >
> > In het kader van de uitoefening van onze taken verzamelen we bij Aquafin
> persoonsgegevens. Hoe we omgaan met deze gegevens en wat de rechten van de
> betrokkenen zijn, kan je nalezen in onze privacy policy<
> https://www.aquafin.be/nl-be/privacy-policy>.
> >
> > P Denk aan het milieu. Druk deze mail niet onnodig af.
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Rancid-discuss mailing list
> > Rancid-discuss at shrubbery.net
> > http://www.shrubbery.net/mailman/listinfo/rancid-discuss
>
>
>
> --
>
> FF
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Rancid-discuss mailing list
>
> <Rancid-discuss at shrubbery.net>
>
> *Rancid-discuss at shrubbery.net <Rancid-discuss at shrubbery.net>*
>
>
> <http://www.shrubbery.net/mailman/listinfo/rancid-discuss>
>
> *http://www.shrubbery.net/mailman/listinfo/rancid-discuss <http://www.shrubbery.net/mailman/listinfo/rancid-discuss>*
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rancid-discuss mailing list
> Rancid-discuss at shrubbery.net
> http://www.shrubbery.net/mailman/listinfo/rancid-discuss
>
--
FF
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.shrubbery.net/pipermail/rancid-discuss/attachments/20190701/1883ee11/attachment.html>
More information about the Rancid-discuss
mailing list