From weylin at bu.edu  Sun May  3 19:10:56 2020
From: weylin at bu.edu (Piegorsch, Weylin William)
Date: Sun, 3 May 2020 19:10:56 +0000
Subject: [rancid] Unable to pull configuration from Cisco WLC 8.5
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR02MB5062E22AE2106326279D449B88D20@BYAPR02MB5062.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
References: <BYAPR02MB5062E22AE2106326279D449B88D20@BYAPR02MB5062.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <483BB477-3AD5-41AA-9076-E29BA340666D@bu.edu>

Do you have the .raw file?

I had this problem at one point too.  It had something to do with not correctly parsing the logout sequence.  I modified my version to check for the right sequence, but it was an old version of rancid, and my specific logout sequence was caught in a newer version.  But, 8.5.161 might have changed the specific text that the logout sequence sends, so rancid?s parser might not catch it yet.

Weylin



From: Charles Allen <charles.allen at zagg.com>
Date: Wednesday, April 22, 2020 at 5:36 PM
To: "rancid-discuss at www.shrubbery.net" <rancid-discuss at www.shrubbery.net>
Subject: [rancid] Unable to pull configuration from Cisco WLC 8.5

Rancid version: 3.12
Cisco WLC: 8.5.161.0

I cannot successfully pull the configuration from my Cisco WLC.  In every case, it just gives the generic error ?End of run not found.?  However, if I execute the command to pull configuration via rancid, the .new file looks complete and without issue.  I have tried changing the various commands executed but with no success.  Looking for a smarter person than I to perhaps give some direction or recommendations.

[rancid at xxxx ~]$ NOPIPE=yes rancid -d -t cisco-wlc8 wlc
loadtype: device type cisco-wlc8
loadtype: found device type cisco-wlc8 at /usr/local/rancid/etc/rancid.types.base:351
executing wlogin -t 120 -c"show udi;show sysinfo;show run-config commands" wlc
PROMPT MATCH: \(Cisco Controller\) >
HIT COMMAND:(Cisco Controller) >show udi
    In ShowUdi: (Cisco Controller) >show udi
HIT COMMAND:(Cisco Controller) >show sysinfo
    In ShowSysinfo: (Cisco Controller) >show sysinfo
HIT COMMAND:(Cisco Controller) >show run-config commands
    In ShowConfig: (Cisco Controller) >show run-config commands
wlc    : End of run not found
wlc    : clean_run is false
!--WLC End Config Data--!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.shrubbery.net/pipermail/rancid-discuss/attachments/20200503/1a06b0f5/attachment.htm>

From on at LEFerguson.com  Mon May  4 00:56:43 2020
From: on at LEFerguson.com (on at LEFerguson.com)
Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 00:56:43 +0000
Subject: [rancid] Rancid 3.10 and ASA 9.14 failing?
In-Reply-To: <CAFPFpmV=LmkN5ViFoJwOLiC28q53YV7XU+MvDZqX4Fw9rNj-Sg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BN7PR05MB5764083ED8477A97CEAE68B1D5AF0@BN7PR05MB5764.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
 <CAFPFpmV=LmkN5ViFoJwOLiC28q53YV7XU+MvDZqX4Fw9rNj-Sg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <BN7PR05MB57645947F609F2496BB566FDD5A60@BN7PR05MB5764.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>

My apologies, I think I missed this one.  Thank you for testing.

Why is "no aaa authentication login-history" needed?   I've tried it both ways and it still works.   While I think it's pretty moot from a practical standpoint, most security auditors will complain if it's off.



From: Ryan Gelobter [mailto:ryan.g at atwgpc.net]
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 12:03 AM
To: on at LEFerguson.com
Cc: rancid-discuss at shrubbery.net
Subject: Re: [rancid] Rancid 3.10 and ASA 9.14 failing?

I spun up an ASAv 9.14.1 with a brand new rancid 3.10 install and had no issues. I assume you know about making sure you run 'no aaa authentication login-history' as that's needed for 9.9 as well. I can't remember if cisco added that banner prompt in 9.2.

Regards,
Ryan

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 11:59 AM on at LEFerguson.com<mailto:on at LEFerguson.com> <on at leferguson.com<mailto:on at leferguson.com>> wrote:
I'm on 3.10 and just upgraded an cisco 5516 asa to 9.14, and it will not pull from rancid giving this error:

HIT COMMAND:XXXXX-ASA1# show running-config
    In WriteTerm: XXXXX-ASA1# show running-config
HIT COMMAND:XXXXX-ASA1# write term
    In WriteTerm: XXXXX-ASA1# write term
xxxxx-asa1.etsbcad.local: missed cmd(s): show redundancy secondary, show flash:, show running-config view full

Another otherwise identically configured ASA on 9.9(2) works fine.

All three of these commands work the same on 9.2 as on 9.14 (i.e. first and third do not exist, and show flash works). So it's something more subtle.

I've reviewed the release notes for 3.11 and didn't see anything that may apply; I am a bit reluctant to upgrade as I have a lot of changes to scripts to retrofit and upgrading is a pretty big job.

It's also remotely possible I broke this in one of my changes; again, a bit painful to back all changes out to tell.

So? please save me a bit of time? is anyone using ASA version 9.14 with Rancid?   Does it work, or fail the same way?  Knowing either one will save me a lot of time.

Thanks,
Linwood

_______________________________________________
Rancid-discuss mailing list
Rancid-discuss at www.shrubbery.net<mailto:Rancid-discuss at www.shrubbery.net>
https://www.shrubbery.net/mailman/listinfo/rancid-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.shrubbery.net/pipermail/rancid-discuss/attachments/20200504/78363e47/attachment.htm>

From charles.allen at zagg.com  Mon May  4 15:21:16 2020
From: charles.allen at zagg.com (Charles Allen)
Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 15:21:16 +0000
Subject: [rancid] Unable to pull configuration from Cisco WLC 8.5
In-Reply-To: <483BB477-3AD5-41AA-9076-E29BA340666D@bu.edu>
References: <BYAPR02MB5062E22AE2106326279D449B88D20@BYAPR02MB5062.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
 <483BB477-3AD5-41AA-9076-E29BA340666D@bu.edu>
Message-ID: <BYAPR02MB50620795D6191C029BC815D588A60@BYAPR02MB5062.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>

Weylin,

You are correct that a lot of my issue was surrounding the logout sequence.  Thankfully I was able to get this resolved with the help of John from Rancid.  There were two things that were impacting me:


  *   First, I had an issue with TACACS where the 'config paging disable' could not be executed.  To expand on this, there are seven groups to which a user could be assigned on the WLC.  It just so happened that I was using the one group, MONITOR, that didn?t allow for the config level command to issues.
  *   Second, in the process of my troubleshooting I had started to tweak the versions of EXPECT and TCL because of a separate email chain I had read on the discussion board.  I had to recently rebuild my server because of a variety of issues.  After reinstalling Rancid the WLC scripts now all work correctly.

A couple of things to note that might help people who encounter this issue, some information on install: Centos 7, fully patched, I am running EXPECT version 5.45 and TCL version 8.5.  Also I?m running Rancid 3.12.

Thanks.

Charlie Allen

From: Piegorsch, Weylin William <weylin at bu.edu>
Sent: Sunday, May 3, 2020 1:11 PM
To: Charles Allen <charles.allen at zagg.com>; rancid-discuss at www.shrubbery.net
Subject: Re: [rancid] Unable to pull configuration from Cisco WLC 8.5

Do you have the .raw file?

I had this problem at one point too.  It had something to do with not correctly parsing the logout sequence.  I modified my version to check for the right sequence, but it was an old version of rancid, and my specific logout sequence was caught in a newer version.  But, 8.5.161 might have changed the specific text that the logout sequence sends, so rancid?s parser might not catch it yet.

Weylin



From: Charles Allen <charles.allen at zagg.com<mailto:charles.allen at zagg.com>>
Date: Wednesday, April 22, 2020 at 5:36 PM
To: "rancid-discuss at www.shrubbery.net<mailto:rancid-discuss at www.shrubbery.net>" <rancid-discuss at www.shrubbery.net<mailto:rancid-discuss at www.shrubbery.net>>
Subject: [rancid] Unable to pull configuration from Cisco WLC 8.5

Rancid version: 3.12
Cisco WLC: 8.5.161.0

I cannot successfully pull the configuration from my Cisco WLC.  In every case, it just gives the generic error ?End of run not found.?  However, if I execute the command to pull configuration via rancid, the .new file looks complete and without issue.  I have tried changing the various commands executed but with no success.  Looking for a smarter person than I to perhaps give some direction or recommendations.

[rancid at xxxx ~]$ NOPIPE=yes rancid -d -t cisco-wlc8 wlc
loadtype: device type cisco-wlc8
loadtype: found device type cisco-wlc8 at /usr/local/rancid/etc/rancid.types.base:351
executing wlogin -t 120 -c"show udi;show sysinfo;show run-config commands" wlc
PROMPT MATCH: \(Cisco Controller\) >
HIT COMMAND:(Cisco Controller) >show udi
    In ShowUdi: (Cisco Controller) >show udi
HIT COMMAND:(Cisco Controller) >show sysinfo
    In ShowSysinfo: (Cisco Controller) >show sysinfo
HIT COMMAND:(Cisco Controller) >show run-config commands
    In ShowConfig: (Cisco Controller) >show run-config commands
wlc    : End of run not found
wlc    : clean_run is false
!--WLC End Config Data--!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.shrubbery.net/pipermail/rancid-discuss/attachments/20200504/f984c621/attachment.htm>

From ryan.g at atwgpc.net  Mon May  4 23:23:32 2020
From: ryan.g at atwgpc.net (Ryan Gelobter)
Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 18:23:32 -0500
Subject: [rancid] Rancid 3.10 and ASA 9.14 failing?
In-Reply-To: <BN7PR05MB57645947F609F2496BB566FDD5A60@BN7PR05MB5764.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <BN7PR05MB5764083ED8477A97CEAE68B1D5AF0@BN7PR05MB5764.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
 <CAFPFpmV=LmkN5ViFoJwOLiC28q53YV7XU+MvDZqX4Fw9rNj-Sg@mail.gmail.com>
 <BN7PR05MB57645947F609F2496BB566FDD5A60@BN7PR05MB5764.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <CAFPFpmWtynqtE3JeRdG7LOLs2Z9PZyKdDCGuX0KnbqkW0RrpEw@mail.gmail.com>

Maybe there's an option or a patch I'm missing but I've noticed if I have
that on, rancid fails to backup because it messes with the first line it
expects when it logs in.

Regards,
Rya

On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 7:56 PM on at LEFerguson.com <on at leferguson.com> wrote:

> My apologies, I think I missed this one.  Thank you for testing.
>
>
>
> Why is "no aaa authentication login-history" needed?   I've tried it both
> ways and it still works.   While I think it's pretty moot from a practical
> standpoint, most security auditors will complain if it's off.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Ryan Gelobter [mailto:ryan.g at atwgpc.net]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 28, 2020 12:03 AM
> *To:* on at LEFerguson.com
> *Cc:* rancid-discuss at shrubbery.net
> *Subject:* Re: [rancid] Rancid 3.10 and ASA 9.14 failing?
>
>
>
> I spun up an ASAv 9.14.1 with a brand new rancid 3.10 install and had no
> issues. I assume you know about making sure you run 'no aaa authentication
> login-history' as that's needed for 9.9 as well. I can't remember if cisco
> added that banner prompt in 9.2.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Ryan
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 11:59 AM on at LEFerguson.com <on at leferguson.com>
> wrote:
>
> I'm on 3.10 and just upgraded an cisco 5516 asa to 9.14, and it will not
> pull from rancid giving this error:
>
>
>
> HIT COMMAND:XXXXX-ASA1# show running-config
>
>     In WriteTerm: XXXXX-ASA1# show running-config
>
> HIT COMMAND:XXXXX-ASA1# write term
>
>     In WriteTerm: XXXXX-ASA1# write term
>
> xxxxx-asa1.etsbcad.local: missed cmd(s): show redundancy secondary, show
> flash:, show running-config view full
>
>
>
> Another otherwise identically configured ASA on 9.9(2) works fine.
>
>
>
> All three of these commands work the same on 9.2 as on 9.14 (i.e. first
> and third do not exist, and show flash works). So it's something more
> subtle.
>
>
>
> I've reviewed the release notes for 3.11 and didn't see anything that may
> apply; I am a bit reluctant to upgrade as I have a lot of changes to
> scripts to retrofit and upgrading is a pretty big job.
>
>
>
> It's also remotely possible I broke this in one of my changes; again, a
> bit painful to back all changes out to tell.
>
>
>
> So? please save me a bit of time? is anyone using ASA version 9.14 with
> Rancid?   Does it work, or fail the same way?  Knowing either one will save
> me a lot of time.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Linwood
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rancid-discuss mailing list
> Rancid-discuss at www.shrubbery.net
> https://www.shrubbery.net/mailman/listinfo/rancid-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.shrubbery.net/pipermail/rancid-discuss/attachments/20200504/63564eb1/attachment.htm>

From on at LEFerguson.com  Mon May  4 23:30:07 2020
From: on at LEFerguson.com (on at LEFerguson.com)
Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 23:30:07 +0000
Subject: [rancid] Rancid 3.10 and ASA 9.14 failing?
In-Reply-To: <CAFPFpmWtynqtE3JeRdG7LOLs2Z9PZyKdDCGuX0KnbqkW0RrpEw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BN7PR05MB5764083ED8477A97CEAE68B1D5AF0@BN7PR05MB5764.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
 <CAFPFpmV=LmkN5ViFoJwOLiC28q53YV7XU+MvDZqX4Fw9rNj-Sg@mail.gmail.com>
 <BN7PR05MB57645947F609F2496BB566FDD5A60@BN7PR05MB5764.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
 <CAFPFpmWtynqtE3JeRdG7LOLs2Z9PZyKdDCGuX0KnbqkW0RrpEw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <BN7PR05MB57645D3450A4C0D34324147AD5A60@BN7PR05MB5764.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>

That may be something I fixed, frankly I've lost track of all the little things like that I've patched.  That's one reason that upgrades are so hard, I have to do a lot of differences each time.  I need to investigate where it is with github, maybe I can do a more managed version; when I started I do not think it was possible.

But thanks for the reminder; now when I see that piece of code next upgrade I may recognize it.  ?


From: Ryan Gelobter [mailto:ryan.g at atwgpc.net]
Sent: Monday, May 4, 2020 7:24 PM
To: on at LEFerguson.com; rancid-discuss at shrubbery.net
Subject: Re: [rancid] Rancid 3.10 and ASA 9.14 failing?

Maybe there's an option or a patch I'm missing but I've noticed if I have that on, rancid fails to backup because it messes with the first line it expects when it logs in.

Regards,
Rya

On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 7:56 PM on at LEFerguson.com<mailto:on at LEFerguson.com> <on at leferguson.com<mailto:on at leferguson.com>> wrote:
My apologies, I think I missed this one.  Thank you for testing.

Why is "no aaa authentication login-history" needed?   I've tried it both ways and it still works.   While I think it's pretty moot from a practical standpoint, most security auditors will complain if it's off.



From: Ryan Gelobter [mailto:ryan.g at atwgpc.net<mailto:ryan.g at atwgpc.net>]
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 12:03 AM
To: on at LEFerguson.com<mailto:on at LEFerguson.com>
Cc: rancid-discuss at shrubbery.net<mailto:rancid-discuss at shrubbery.net>
Subject: Re: [rancid] Rancid 3.10 and ASA 9.14 failing?

I spun up an ASAv 9.14.1 with a brand new rancid 3.10 install and had no issues. I assume you know about making sure you run 'no aaa authentication login-history' as that's needed for 9.9 as well. I can't remember if cisco added that banner prompt in 9.2.

Regards,
Ryan

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 11:59 AM on at LEFerguson.com<mailto:on at LEFerguson.com> <on at leferguson.com<mailto:on at leferguson.com>> wrote:
I'm on 3.10 and just upgraded an cisco 5516 asa to 9.14, and it will not pull from rancid giving this error:

HIT COMMAND:XXXXX-ASA1# show running-config
    In WriteTerm: XXXXX-ASA1# show running-config
HIT COMMAND:XXXXX-ASA1# write term
    In WriteTerm: XXXXX-ASA1# write term
xxxxx-asa1.etsbcad.local: missed cmd(s): show redundancy secondary, show flash:, show running-config view full

Another otherwise identically configured ASA on 9.9(2) works fine.

All three of these commands work the same on 9.2 as on 9.14 (i.e. first and third do not exist, and show flash works). So it's something more subtle.

I've reviewed the release notes for 3.11 and didn't see anything that may apply; I am a bit reluctant to upgrade as I have a lot of changes to scripts to retrofit and upgrading is a pretty big job.

It's also remotely possible I broke this in one of my changes; again, a bit painful to back all changes out to tell.

So? please save me a bit of time? is anyone using ASA version 9.14 with Rancid?   Does it work, or fail the same way?  Knowing either one will save me a lot of time.

Thanks,
Linwood

_______________________________________________
Rancid-discuss mailing list
Rancid-discuss at www.shrubbery.net<mailto:Rancid-discuss at www.shrubbery.net>
https://www.shrubbery.net/mailman/listinfo/rancid-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.shrubbery.net/pipermail/rancid-discuss/attachments/20200504/42241a62/attachment.htm>

From heas at shrubbery.net  Tue May  5 01:28:47 2020
From: heas at shrubbery.net (john heasley)
Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 01:28:47 +0000
Subject: [rancid] Rancid 3.10 and ASA 9.14 failing?
In-Reply-To: <CAFPFpmWtynqtE3JeRdG7LOLs2Z9PZyKdDCGuX0KnbqkW0RrpEw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BN7PR05MB5764083ED8477A97CEAE68B1D5AF0@BN7PR05MB5764.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
 <CAFPFpmV=LmkN5ViFoJwOLiC28q53YV7XU+MvDZqX4Fw9rNj-Sg@mail.gmail.com>
 <BN7PR05MB57645947F609F2496BB566FDD5A60@BN7PR05MB5764.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
 <CAFPFpmWtynqtE3JeRdG7LOLs2Z9PZyKdDCGuX0KnbqkW0RrpEw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20200505012847.GC17507@shrubbery.net>

Mon, May 04, 2020 at 06:23:32PM -0500, Ryan Gelobter:
> Maybe there's an option or a patch I'm missing but I've noticed if I have
> that on, rancid fails to backup because it messes with the first line it
> expects when it logs in.

I think this is what you're looking for, also in rancid 3.8:
https://github.com/haussli/rancid/commit/8c42b459807713226c5bc89a0038a77a778ebc69


From troy at i2bnetworks.com  Thu May  7 20:53:16 2020
From: troy at i2bnetworks.com (Troy Beisigl)
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 13:53:16 -0700
Subject: [rancid] FS switches
Message-ID: <DE5161E9-178D-4CE1-8D1C-ACAF176AC9EA@i2bnetworks.com>

Hello Everyone,

I was trying to do a google search for anyone using rancid with FS switches. It basically came up with nothing. So I thought I would post here. We are looking to add some FS S5500 switches to rancid. Has anyone written a plugin for these switches?

Best,

-Troy

From troyb at spacelink.com  Thu May  7 21:19:02 2020
From: troyb at spacelink.com (Troy Beisigl)
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 14:19:02 -0700
Subject: [rancid] FS switches
Message-ID: <A7352BBC-1768-42DE-9AE3-8CD836E4D55F@spacelink.com>

Hello Everyone,

I was trying to do a google search for anyone using rancid with FS switches. It basically came up with nothing. So I thought I would post here. We are looking to add some FS S5500 switches to rancid. Has anyone written a plugin for these switches?

Best,

-Troy

From michael.kupec at blueovalcorral.com  Thu May  7 22:52:20 2020
From: michael.kupec at blueovalcorral.com (Michael J Kupec)
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 18:52:20 -0400
Subject: [rancid] Temp disable a device in rancid
Message-ID: <D39C74EE-BDBD-48E4-A49A-FAAF73948328@blueovalcorral.com>

We?ve moved our data center network to a new set of up addresses and I havdd Ed a couple devices sending out alerts they are unavailable. 
I thought I had bookmarked a site that talked about suspending the alerts but can?t find it. 
Anyone have a link to how to disable the warning messages?

Sent via iPhone
MJKupec
mkupec at designdata.com

From c.o.hopkins at gmail.com  Fri May  8 16:13:24 2020
From: c.o.hopkins at gmail.com (Craig Hopkins)
Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 17:13:24 +0100
Subject: [rancid] Temp disable a device in rancid
In-Reply-To: <D39C74EE-BDBD-48E4-A49A-FAAF73948328@blueovalcorral.com>
References: <D39C74EE-BDBD-48E4-A49A-FAAF73948328@blueovalcorral.com>
Message-ID: <CAAHxzyuX_wF__nma-spfDddYhsHwFp1DzrdNu2Ho0CwqK1QkRQ@mail.gmail.com>

In your router.db file mark them as down

On Thu, 7 May 2020, 23:52 Michael J Kupec, <michael.kupec at blueovalcorral.com>
wrote:

> We?ve moved our data center network to a new set of up addresses and I
> havdd Ed a couple devices sending out alerts they are unavailable.
> I thought I had bookmarked a site that talked about suspending the alerts
> but can?t find it.
> Anyone have a link to how to disable the warning messages?
>
> Sent via iPhone
> MJKupec
> mkupec at designdata.com
> _______________________________________________
> Rancid-discuss mailing list
> Rancid-discuss at www.shrubbery.net
> https://www.shrubbery.net/mailman/listinfo/rancid-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.shrubbery.net/pipermail/rancid-discuss/attachments/20200508/ec00b06e/attachment.htm>

From heas at shrubbery.net  Fri May  8 16:18:29 2020
From: heas at shrubbery.net (john heasley)
Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 16:18:29 +0000
Subject: [rancid] Temp disable a device in rancid
In-Reply-To: <CAAHxzyuX_wF__nma-spfDddYhsHwFp1DzrdNu2Ho0CwqK1QkRQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <D39C74EE-BDBD-48E4-A49A-FAAF73948328@blueovalcorral.com>
 <CAAHxzyuX_wF__nma-spfDddYhsHwFp1DzrdNu2Ho0CwqK1QkRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20200508161829.GD20235@shrubbery.net>

Fri, May 08, 2020 at 05:13:24PM +0100, Craig Hopkins:
> In your router.db file mark them as down

FWIW, anything other than 'up' is considered 'down'; meaning that you can
mark these devies with some other tag, such as "temporarily_disabled".

A trailing field may also exist, such as:
	hostname;type;down;disabled for maintenance PR# nnnn


From ggiesen at giesen.me  Mon May 11 19:39:19 2020
From: ggiesen at giesen.me (=?utf-8?q?Gary_T=2E_Giesen?=)
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 15:39:19 -0400
Subject: [rancid] 
 =?utf-8?b?Pz09P3V0Zi04P3E/ICBwcm94eS1sb2dpbiByYW5jaWQg?=
 =?utf-8?q?collection?=
In-Reply-To: <20150325161446.GF45425@shrubbery.net>
Message-ID: <6b2d-5eb9aa00-3-7202978@143392629>


Did this ever get implemented? I have looked through a bunch of release notes and mail list archives but I could not find any further mention of it.

Thanks,

GTG

On Wednesday, March 25, 2015 12:14 EDT, heasley <heas at shrubbery.net> wrote:
?Many have asked for this and it will probably be the primary addition to
rancid 3.3, but I do not have a use for it, so although I've digested most
of the maillist discussion on the topic ('out of band access script change',
'download configs from on router through another', etc), I'm not sure that
I'd include all the relevant features, therefore i want to solicit input.

I am tempted to limit the utility to executing other login scripts, ie:
the assumption that it through a device supported by one of rancid's login
scripts, rather than an arbitrary unix command.

Please feel free to reply to me directly or to the list.
_______________________________________________
Rancid-discuss mailing list
Rancid-discuss at shrubbery.net
http://www.shrubbery.net/mailman/listinfo/rancid-discuss


?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.shrubbery.net/pipermail/rancid-discuss/attachments/20200511/2f663b14/attachment.htm>

From Wayne.Eisenberg at carolinasit.com  Tue May 12 19:12:41 2020
From: Wayne.Eisenberg at carolinasit.com (Wayne Eisenberg)
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 19:12:41 +0000
Subject: [rancid] misc questions
Message-ID: <BYAPR04MB61200F6101AAD3F5DD3CA215E2BE0@BYAPR04MB6120.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>

Hi,

I'm sure it's there and I'm just not searching properly, but how does rancid stop the '--More--' prompt on Catalyst switches? I usually see/use 'terminal length 0' , but I don't find that in the rancid.pm or ios.pm modules. (I'm on v3.6.2 at the moment.)

Also, in the line " cisco;command;ios::WriteTerm;more system:running-config;ASA/PIX" what does the last ';ASA/PIX' section for? Just a comment? Does the script do something with it or does the script simply ignore everything after the command section?

Thanks,
Wayne





________________________________

This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Logically, Inc. proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Logically, Inc.. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.


From heas at shrubbery.net  Tue May 12 22:58:21 2020
From: heas at shrubbery.net (john heasley)
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 22:58:21 +0000
Subject: [rancid] misc questions
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR04MB61200F6101AAD3F5DD3CA215E2BE0@BYAPR04MB6120.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
References: <BYAPR04MB61200F6101AAD3F5DD3CA215E2BE0@BYAPR04MB6120.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <20200512225821.GD68988@shrubbery.net>

Tue, May 12, 2020 at 07:12:41PM +0000, Wayne Eisenberg:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm sure it's there and I'm just not searching properly, but how does rancid stop the '--More--' prompt on Catalyst switches? I usually see/use 'terminal length 0' , but I don't find that in the rancid.pm or ios.pm modules. (I'm on v3.6.2 at the moment.)

the login script tries to disable the pager.  where it can not, it tries
to filter it from the output.

> Also, in the line " cisco;command;ios::WriteTerm;more system:running-config;ASA/PIX" what does the last ';ASA/PIX' section for? Just a comment? Does the script do something with it or does the script simply ignore everything after the command section?

In router.db or rancid.types.{conf,base}, additional trailing fields are
ignored.


From Mikko.Peltokangas at alavus.fi  Wed May 13 07:15:14 2020
From: Mikko.Peltokangas at alavus.fi (Peltokangas Mikko)
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 07:15:14 +0000
Subject: [rancid] Extreme 200-series switches
In-Reply-To: <1589311380826.68330@alavus.fi>
References: <1589311380826.68330@alavus.fi>
Message-ID: <1589354114188.27901@alavus.fi>





??Hello,

is there any good guide to backup Extreme 200-series switches?


--
Br,
Mikko Peltokangas
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.shrubbery.net/pipermail/rancid-discuss/attachments/20200513/dcc6e79a/attachment.htm>

From heas at shrubbery.net  Wed May 13 19:21:50 2020
From: heas at shrubbery.net (heasley)
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 19:21:50 +0000
Subject: [rancid] proxy-login rancid collection
In-Reply-To: <6b2d-5eb9aa00-3-7202978@143392629>
References: <20150325161446.GF45425@shrubbery.net>
 <6b2d-5eb9aa00-3-7202978@143392629>
Message-ID: <20200513192150.GJ66669@shrubbery.net>

Mon, May 11, 2020 at 03:39:19PM -0400, Gary T. Giesen:
> 
> Did this ever get implemented? I have looked through a bunch of release notes and mail list archives but I could not find any further mention of it.

I have nothing usable yet.  I will work on that next.  There are two hack
that were contributed on the ML that might suit you for the immediate.

> Thanks,
> 
> GTG
> 
> On Wednesday, March 25, 2015 12:14 EDT, heasley <heas at shrubbery.net> wrote:
> ?Many have asked for this and it will probably be the primary addition to
> rancid 3.3, but I do not have a use for it, so although I've digested most
> of the maillist discussion on the topic ('out of band access script change',
> 'download configs from on router through another', etc), I'm not sure that
> I'd include all the relevant features, therefore i want to solicit input.
> 
> I am tempted to limit the utility to executing other login scripts, ie:
> the assumption that it through a device supported by one of rancid's login
> scripts, rather than an arbitrary unix command.
> 
> Please feel free to reply to me directly or to the list.
> _______________________________________________
> Rancid-discuss mailing list
> Rancid-discuss at shrubbery.net
> http://www.shrubbery.net/mailman/listinfo/rancid-discuss
> 
> 
> ?


From timoid at timoid.org  Thu May 14 06:12:10 2020
From: timoid at timoid.org (Tim Warnock)
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 06:12:10 +0000
Subject: [rancid] Sanity Check - A10login
Message-ID: <e00148bdde574f5a8761953551b5eef4@timoid.org>

Hi Guys,

As per https://github.com/haussli/rancid/blob/master/bin/a10login.in

Would you expect line 320 to read:
-re "Are you sure .*to quit" {

Currently its missing the -re part and it doesn't seem to work without it.

Thanks
Tim.