[tac_plus] Re: Possible Bug in tacacs+-F4.0.4.10

[Vermilion, Lance]

John,

You are a life saver. Thank you. I didn't think to look at that. That
fixed me. Is there a way to add a check like that in the code? Make sure
the user has perms to that file and if not error on it?

Lance Vermilion
Communications System Engineer
Best Western International, Inc. | The World's Largest Hotel Chain(r)
20400 N. 29th Avenue
Phoenix, Arizona 85027

--Contact Info--
Office:  623.780.6637
Mobile: 602.354.6365
eMail:   lance.vermilion at bestwestern.com

-----Original Message-----
From: john heasley [mailto:heas at shrubbery.net] 
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 3:18 PM
To: Vermilion, Lance
Cc: tac_plus at shrubbery.net
Subject: Re: [tac_plus] Possible Bug in tacacs+-F4.0.4.10

Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 03:11:07PM -0700, Vermilion, Lance:
> if I check to make sure it is running I see the following
> </home/vermill/tarz/tacacs+-F4.0.4.10>: ps aux | egrep "tac_plus|PID"
> USER       PID %CPU %MEM    VSZ   RSS TTY      STAT START   TIME
COMMAND
> tac_plus 27564  0.0  0.0   1912   648 pts/3    S    14:43   0:00
> /usr/local/bin/tac_plus -C /etc/tacacs/tac_plus.conf -d 256

Can user 'tac_plus' or it's gid(s) read /etc/tacacs/tac_plus.conf?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Vermilion, Lance.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 275 bytes
Desc: Vermilion, Lance.vcf
Url : http://www.shrubbery.net/pipermail/tac_plus/attachments/20061201/2765b423/attachment.vcf