[tac_plus] Re: Issue with Cisco switch authentication against Microsoft Active Directory

Mon Nov 23 18:43:00 UTC 2009

Thanks John for helping me check this issue.

I just run tac_plus -C /path/to/tac_plus.conf -L -p 49 -d256 -g to see the
log in stdout and in log file. I can't see any suspicious log information
here. I paste the log below:

Sat Nov 21 22:28:22 2009 [3393]: Waiting for packet
Sat Nov 21 22:28:27 2009 [3393]: Read AUTHEN/CONT size=23
Sat Nov 21 22:28:27 2009 [3393]: PACKET: key=mykey
Sat Nov 21 22:28:27 2009 [3393]: version 192 (0xc0), type 1, seq no 5, flags
0x1
Sat Nov 21 22:28:27 2009 [3393]: session_id 3295176910 (0xc46868ce), Data
length
 11 (0xb)
Sat Nov 21 22:28:27 2009 [3393]: End header
Sat Nov 21 22:28:27 2009 [3393]: type=AUTHEN/CONT
Sat Nov 21 22:28:27 2009 [3393]: user_msg_len 6 (0x6), user_data_len 0 (0x0)
Sat Nov 21 22:28:27 2009 [3393]: flags=0x0
Sat Nov 21 22:28:27 2009 [3393]: User msg:
Sat Nov 21 22:28:27 2009 [3393]: myusername
Sat Nov 21 22:28:27 2009 [3393]: User data:
Sat Nov 21 22:28:27 2009 [3393]: End packet
Sat Nov 21 22:28:27 2009 [3393]: choose_authen chose default_fn
Sat Nov 21 22:28:27 2009 [3393]: Calling authentication function
Sat Nov 21 22:28:27 2009 [3393]: Writing AUTHEN/GETPASS size=28
Sat Nov 21 22:28:27 2009 [3393]: PACKET: key=mykey
Sat Nov 21 22:28:27 2009 [3393]: version 192 (0xc0), type 1, seq no 6, flags
0x1
Sat Nov 21 22:28:27 2009 [3393]: session_id 3295176910 (0xc46868ce), Data
length
 16 (0x10)
Sat Nov 21 22:28:27 2009 [3393]: End header
Sat Nov 21 22:28:27 2009 [3393]: type=AUTHEN status=5 (AUTHEN/GETPASS)
flags=0x1
Sat Nov 21 22:28:27 2009 [3393]: msg_len=10, data_len=0
Sat Nov 21 22:28:27 2009 [3393]: msg:
Sat Nov 21 22:28:27 2009 [3393]: Password:
Sat Nov 21 22:28:27 2009 [3393]: data:
Sat Nov 21 22:28:27 2009 [3393]: End packet
Sat Nov 21 22:28:27 2009 [3393]: Waiting for packet
Sat Nov 21 22:28:34 2009 [3393]: Read AUTHEN/CONT size=30
Sat Nov 21 22:28:34 2009 [3393]: PACKET: key=metro
Sat Nov 21 22:28:34 2009 [3393]: version 192 (0xc0), type 1, seq no 7, flags
0x1
Sat Nov 21 22:28:34 2009 [3393]: session_id 3295176910 (0xc46868ce), Data
length
 18 (0x12)
Sat Nov 21 22:28:34 2009 [3393]: End header
Sat Nov 21 22:28:34 2009 [3393]: type=AUTHEN/CONT
Sat Nov 21 22:28:34 2009 [3393]: user_msg_len 13 (0xd), user_data_len 0
(0x0)
Sat Nov 21 22:28:34 2009 [3393]: flags=0x0
Sat Nov 21 22:28:34 2009 [3393]: User msg:
Sat Nov 21 22:28:34 2009 [3393]: mypassword
Sat Nov 21 22:28:34 2009 [3393]: User data:
Sat Nov 21 22:28:34 2009 [3393]: End packet
Sat Nov 21 22:28:36 2009 [3393]: login query for 'myusername' tty0 from
10.1.69.89 r
ejected
Sat Nov 21 22:28:36 2009 [3393]: login failure: myusername 10.1.69.89
(10.1.69.89) t
ty0
Sat Nov 21 22:28:36 2009 [3393]: Writing AUTHEN/FAIL size=18
Sat Nov 21 22:28:36 2009 [3393]: PACKET: key=mykey
Sat Nov 21 22:28:36 2009 [3393]: version 192 (0xc0), type 1, seq no 8, flags
0x1
Sat Nov 21 22:28:36 2009 [3393]: session_id 3295176910 (0xc46868ce), Data
length
 6 (0x6)
Sat Nov 21 22:28:36 2009 [3393]: End header
Sat Nov 21 22:28:36 2009 [3393]: type=AUTHEN status=2 (AUTHEN/FAIL)
flags=0x0
Sat Nov 21 22:28:36 2009 [3393]: msg_len=0, data_len=0
Sat Nov 21 22:28:36 2009 [3393]: msg:
Sat Nov 21 22:28:36 2009 [3393]: data:
Sat Nov 21 22:28:36 2009 [3393]: End packet
Sat Nov 21 22:28:36 2009 [3393]: 10.1.69.89: disconnect

On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:23 PM, john heasley <heas at shrubbery.net> wrote:

> Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:12:58PM -0600, Hailu Meng:
> > Hi Adam,
> >
> > If the ldapsearch -D "" -w "" runs successfully, what do we suppose to
> get
> > from the output? I just got all of the user information in that group.
> Does
> > that means my password and username got authenticated successfully
> against
> > AD?
> >
> > This thing drives me crazy. I need solve it through this week before the
> > holiday...
>
> i havent followed this thread, as i know nearly zero about ldap.  but,
> have you enabled authentication debugging in the tacacas daemon and
> checked the logs to determine what is coming back from pam?  it very
> well may be that the ldap client is working just fine, but there is a
> pam module bug or a bug in the tacplus daemon or that your device
> simply doesnt like something about the replies.
>
> > Thanks a lot for the help.
> >
> > Lou
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Hailu Meng <hailumeng at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Still no clue how to turn on the log. binding seems good. See my
> findings
> > > below. Thanks a lot.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 9:26 PM, adam <prozaconstilts at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hailu Meng wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Adam,
> > >>>
> > >>> I tried the su - "userid" in my tacacs+ server but I don't have that
> > >>> userid in CentOS. So the CentOS just don't want me log in. I think
> this will
> > >>> not ask tacacs server to authenticate against AD.
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> You shouldn't need to have to define the user in CentOS, that's the
> point
> > >> of using ldap for authentication. The user is defined in ldap, not in
> > >> CentOS. Now that I think about it, su - <user> probably wouldn't work
> > >> anyway, as AD doesn't by default have the data needed by a linux box
> to
> > >> allow login...but see below for more options.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> Is there any other way to test ldap authentication against AD with
> the
> > >>> userid in AD? I tried ldapsearch. It did find my user id without
> problem.
> > >>> But I haven't found any option to try with password and authenticate
> against
> > >>> AD.
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> Try using -D:
> > >>
> > >> from `man ldapsearch`:
> > >>
> > >> -D binddn
> > >>  Use the Distinguished Name binddn to bind to the LDAP directory.
> > >>
> > >> so -D cn=username,ou=my_ou,dc=my_dc should let you try to authenticate
> > >> using whatever user you want to define. Just check and double check
> you get
> > >> the right path in that dn.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> I tried -D " cn=username,ou=my_ou,dc=my_dc " but it just returned lots
> of
> > > users' information. It means successful?
> > >
> > >
> > >>  Do you have ldap server setup or only the openldap library and
> openldap
> > >>> client? I don't understand why the log is not turned on. There must
> be some
> > >>> debugging info in the log which can help solve this issue.
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> only the libs and client. You should not need the server. In the
> > >> ldapsearch, you can use -d <integer> to get debugging info for that
> search.
> > >> As before, higher number = more debug
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>  If the user can authenticate, does ethereal capture some packets
> about
> > >>> password verification? Right now I only see the packets when ldap
> search for
> > >>> my user id and gets results back from AD.
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> Ethereal should catch all data flowing between the client and server.
> If
> > >> you can search out the user in your AD right now, then one of two
> things is
> > >> happening:
> > >>
> > >> 1. You are performing anonymous searches. In this case, no username
> and pw
> > >> is provided, and your AD is happy to hand over info to anyone who asks
> for
> > >> it. If this is the case, you will _not_ see authentication
> information. The
> > >> following MS KB article should probably help you determine on your AD
> if
> > >> anonymous queries are allowed:
> > >>
> > >> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/320528
> > >>
> > >> It has exact instructions for how to get it going, but you can follow
> > >> along with it to check your current settings without making any
> changes.
> > >>
> > >
> > > I checked our setting. Permission type for normal user is "Read &
> Execute".
> > > I click edit to check the detail about permission. I think it only
> allow the
> > > user to read the attributes, permission something and can't modify the
> > > AD.There is "Everyone" setting is also set as "Read & Execute". By the
> way,
> > > the AD is Win2003 R2.
> > >
> > >
> > >>
> > >> 2. Authentication is happening. It will be the _very_ first thing the
> > >> client and server perform, after basic connection establishment. Look
> for it
> > >> at the very beginning of a dump.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Also, it's a bit overkill, but the following article is extremely
> > >> informative about all the different ways you can plug linux into AD
> for
> > >> authentication. It might offer some hints...
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> Maybe I need dig into ldap.conf more. If you have any idea, let me
> know.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thank you very much.
> > >>>
> > >>> Lou
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL:
> http://www.shrubbery.net/pipermail/tac_plus/attachments/20091123/bba3d7fb/attachment.html
> > _______________________________________________
> > tac_plus mailing list
> > tac_plus at shrubbery.net
> > http://www.shrubbery.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/tac_plus
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.shrubbery.net/pipermail/tac_plus/attachments/20091123/e61dd207/attachment.html 