[tac_plus] Re: Multiple groups, multiple ACL-s
Karen Durinyan
karen.durinyan at gmail.com
Wed Mar 31 05:08:46 UTC 2010
Hello Gabor,
First of all thanks for your reply and for patch.
I did mean and I did exactly what you say here.
Here is my config.
...
acl = net-staff-r {
permit = ^10\.0\.127\.12$
return = .*
}
acl = net-staff-u {
#If I have 100 of NAS can I use permit = ".*" here?
permit = ^10\.0\.127\.1$
return = .*
}
...
group = net-staff-r {
service = exec {
priv-lvl = 15
}
cmd = show {
permit ip
permit interface
deny ".*"
}
cmd = exit {
permit ".*"
}
}
group = net-staff-u {
service = exec {
priv-lvl = 15
}
cmd = show {
permit ".*"
}
cmd = exit {
permit ".*"
}
}
group = net-staff-all-r {
acl = net-staff-r
member = net-staff-r
}
group = net-staff-all-u {
acl = net-staff-u
member = net-staff-u
}
...
user = karen {
login = des <something encrypted>
member = net-staff-all-r
member = net-staff-all-u
name = "Karen Durinyan"
}
...
Result is the following:
[karen at srv1 ~]$ ssh racc1
Password:
racc1#show run
Command authorization failed.
racc1#show ip int br
...
Loopback0 10.0.127.12 YES manual up up
racc1#
racc1#exit
Connection to racc1 closed.
[karen at srv1 ~]$ ssh edge1
Password:
edge1#show run
Command authorization failed.
edge1#show ip int br
...
Loopback0 10.0.127.1 YES NVRAM up up
edge1#exit
Connection to edge1 closed.
[karen at srv1 ~]$
It seems ACL match, group match, racc1 working as expected but things are not
correct with edge1. For edge1 I am expecting to be able to run any command
with "show ..." as it is in group definition. Am I missing anything?
Thanks in advance.
--
Bests,
Karen
On Tuesday 30 March 2010 23:47:55 Kiss Gabor (Bitman) wrote:
> > The problem is the following:
> >
> > userA can login on nasA but can issue only "show *" cmd
> > userA can login on nasB but can issue only "ping *" cmd
> > userA can login on nasC but can issue only "exit *" cmd
> >
> > It seems ACLs must be applied to cmd somehow but I do not know how.
> >
> > Is this possible with your patch? Is this possible with tac+ at all?
>
> Do you think this?
>
>
> user = userA {
> member = nasA_show
> member = nasB_ping
> member = nasC_exit
> ...
> }
>
> group nasA_show {
> acl = acl_nasA
> member = cmd_show
> }
>
> acl = acl_nasA {
> permit = <regexp of nasA address>
> return = .*
> }
>
> group = cmd_show
> cmd = show {
> permit .*
> }
> }
>
> ...
>
> Details at
> http://www.shrubbery.net/pipermail/tac_plus/2007-August/000125.html
>
> Gabor
More information about the tac_plus
mailing list