[tac_plus] possible bug?

[Adam Dyess]

There's an analog to the line 150 at line 550 for encoding packets.  The
same issue.
Is this the proper way to enumerate found bugs or is there something I
missed?

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 5:18 PM heasley <heas at shrubbery.net> wrote:

> Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 06:21:30PM +0000, Adam Dyess:
> > packet.c line 150.
> >
> > why would you get the *cfg_get_host_prompt *based on the hostname?  i
> > believe it should be *cfg_get_host_key(session.peer).  *
>
> I believe that you are correct.
>
> Thanks.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.shrubbery.net/pipermail/tac_plus/attachments/20151203/74cdaa3c/attachment.html>