[tac_plus] possible bug?

Adam Dyess adam at adamdyess.com
Thu Dec 3 18:47:50 UTC 2015


Thanks!

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015, 11:32 AM heasley <heas at shrubbery.net> wrote:

> Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 02:13:03PM +0000, Adam Dyess:
> > There's an analog to the line 150 at line 550 for encoding packets.  The
> > same issue.
> > Is this the proper way to enumerate found bugs or is there something I
> > missed?
>
> nope; I updated that as well.
>
> > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 5:18 PM heasley <heas at shrubbery.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 06:21:30PM +0000, Adam Dyess:
> > > > packet.c line 150.
> > > >
> > > > why would you get the *cfg_get_host_prompt *based on the hostname?  i
> > > > believe it should be *cfg_get_host_key(session.peer).  *
> > >
> > > I believe that you are correct.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.shrubbery.net/pipermail/tac_plus/attachments/20151203/9c120184/attachment.html>


More information about the tac_plus mailing list