From owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Fri Nov 8 20:29:33 2002 Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gA8KTX105033 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 20:29:33 GMT Received: (from majordom@localhost) by guelah.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.1) id gA8KQdf26582 for rancid-discuss-outgoing; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 20:26:39 GMT Received: from enttule201.ad.wcg.com (gateway.wcg.com [65.77.117.10]) by guelah.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.1) with ESMTP id gA8KQZx26578 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 20:26:36 GMT Received: from exchange01.ad.wcg.com ([10.16.125.38]) by enttule201.ad.wcg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Fri, 8 Nov 2002 14:26:30 -0600 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 Subject: Firewall lock file Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 14:26:29 -0600 Message-ID: <4B22DB69FF9C6740816631DE6E85DF09FB3E82@EXCHANGE02.ad.wcg.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Firewall lock file Thread-Index: AcKHZR6I3QX731a0S+CXk0/ZejItLQ== From: "Russell, Tony" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Nov 2002 20:26:30.0323 (UTC) FILETIME=[1F1CE830:01C28765] Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by guelah.shrubbery.net id gA8KQax26579 Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk I am constantly receiving the following in e-mail from rancid. Old lockfile still exists: -rw-r----- 1 rancid rancid 0 Nov 8 10:01 /tmp/.firewalls.run.lock I can go in and delete the file but it eventually comes back within a few hours. Can anyone tell me what is going on here so that I can fix it. Tony Russell From owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Fri Nov 8 20:46:04 2002 Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gA8Kk3107160 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 20:46:03 GMT Received: (from majordom@localhost) by guelah.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.1) id gA8Kjva26732 for rancid-discuss-outgoing; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 20:45:58 GMT Received: (from heas@localhost) by guelah.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.1) id gA8Kjr526727; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 20:45:53 GMT Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 12:45:53 -0800 From: john heasley To: "Russell, Tony" Cc: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Subject: Re: Firewall lock file Message-ID: <20021108124553.I11423@shrubbery.net> References: <4B22DB69FF9C6740816631DE6E85DF09FB3E82@EXCHANGE02.ad.wcg.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <4B22DB69FF9C6740816631DE6E85DF09FB3E82@EXCHANGE02.ad.wcg.com>; from Tony.Russell@wcg.com on Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 02:26:29PM -0600 X-note: live free, or die! X-homer: mmmm, forbidden doughnut. Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 02:26:29PM -0600, Russell, Tony: > I am constantly receiving the following in e-mail from rancid. > > Old lockfile still exists: > -rw-r----- 1 rancid rancid 0 Nov 8 10:01 /tmp/.firewalls.run.lock > > I can go in and delete the file but it eventually comes back within a few hours. Can anyone tell me what is going on here so that I can fix it. > > Tony Russell if the file is there, i expect that something is stuck. please look for stuck rancid processes (eg: telnet, ssh, expect). From owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Wed Nov 13 19:27:20 2002 Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gADJRJe16951 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 19:27:19 GMT Received: (from majordom@localhost) by guelah.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.1) id gADJNg606664 for rancid-discuss-outgoing; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 19:23:42 GMT Received: from malasada.lava.net (IDENT:{gqBF7aACv2Hyetr/O9dkQDprwnsVimlG}@malasada.lava.net [64.65.64.17]) by guelah.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.1) with ESMTP id gADJNdx06660 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 19:23:39 GMT Received: from (locally authorised broken client using invalid hostname!) habanero (localhost[127.0.0.1]) (1281 bytes) by malasada.lava.net; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 09:23:38 -1000 (HST) via sendmail [esmtp] id for Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 09:23:35 -1000 From: Robert Brewer To: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Subject: RANCID indiscretion Message-ID: <4997596.1037179415@habanero.lava.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.2.1 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk I've noticed that for our Juniper M5s, RANCID insists on including encrypted passwords in email diffs. I know that for some config fields on some devices, RANCID knows to censor the email, but that doesn't seem to happen for JUNOS: retrieving revision 1.186 diff -u -4 -r1.186 foo.lava.net @@ -216,9 +216,9 @@ full-name Joey; uid 150; class wheel; authentication { - encrypted-password "$1$ebscb3$snwiqn32HF3k8ncZpqlAknY."; + encrypted-password "$1$9skeNalaQpd3$nbs$kyegnSnaRGnzl/"; } } user jim { full-name "Jim Stevens"; Is this something that can be easily fixed? Mahalo. From owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Wed Nov 13 21:21:31 2002 Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gADLLVe20393 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 21:21:31 GMT Received: (from majordom@localhost) by guelah.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.1) id gADLLAG07208 for rancid-discuss-outgoing; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 21:21:10 GMT Received: from mta01bw.bigpond.com (mta01bw.bigpond.com [139.134.6.78]) by guelah.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.1) with ESMTP id gADLL5x07204 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 21:21:06 GMT Received: from milk ([144.135.24.69]) by mta01bw.bigpond.com (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 mta01bw Jul 16 2002 22:47:55) with SMTP id H5J9YX00.72Q; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 07:20:57 +1000 Received: from CPE-144-132-104-104.vic.bigpond.net.au ([144.132.104.104]) by bwmam01.mailsvc.email.bigpond.com(MailRouter V3.0n 8/55133412); 14 Nov 2002 07:20:56 From: "Andrew Fort" To: "'Robert Brewer'" , Subject: RE: RANCID indiscretion Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 08:10:56 +1100 Message-ID: <000101c28b59$2c11a7e0$6401a8c0@milk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 In-Reply-To: <4997596.1037179415@habanero.lava.net> Importance: Normal Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk Robert Brewer wrote, > I've noticed that for our Juniper M5s, RANCID insists on including > encrypted passwords in email diffs. I know that for some > config fields on > some devices, RANCID knows to censor the email, but that > doesn't seem to > happen for JUNOS: > > Is this something that can be easily fixed? Mahalo. > Setting FILTER_PWDS to "ALL" in ./bin/env will do this. -afort From owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Wed Nov 13 23:48:39 2002 Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gADNmde25108 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 23:48:39 GMT Received: (from majordom@localhost) by guelah.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.1) id gADNmBY07928 for rancid-discuss-outgoing; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 23:48:11 GMT Received: (from heas@localhost) by guelah.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.1) id gADNllB07923; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 23:47:47 GMT Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 23:47:47 +0000 From: john heasley To: Andrew Fort Cc: "'Robert Brewer'" , rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Subject: Re: RANCID indiscretion Message-ID: <20021113234747.D7797@shrubbery.net> References: <4997596.1037179415@habanero.lava.net> <000101c28b59$2c11a7e0$6401a8c0@milk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <000101c28b59$2c11a7e0$6401a8c0@milk>; from afort@choqolat.org on Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 08:10:56AM +1100 X-note: live free, or die! X-homer: mmmm, forbidden doughnut. Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 08:10:56AM +1100, Andrew Fort: > Robert Brewer wrote, > > > I've noticed that for our Juniper M5s, RANCID insists on including > > encrypted passwords in email diffs. I know that for some > > config fields on > > some devices, RANCID knows to censor the email, but that > > doesn't seem to > > happen for JUNOS: > > > > Is this something that can be easily fixed? Mahalo. > > > > Setting FILTER_PWDS to "ALL" in ./bin/env will do this. > > -afort true. the passwords that were in the original email were md5; not very easily reversible and hence included. From owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Thu Nov 14 05:49:37 2002 Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAE5nbe06544 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 05:49:37 GMT Received: (from majordom@localhost) by guelah.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.1) id gAE5los10061 for rancid-discuss-outgoing; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 05:47:50 GMT Received: (from heas@localhost) by guelah.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.1) id gAE5ll110056 for rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 05:47:47 GMT Received: from redhat1.mmaero.com (IDENT:root@redhat1.mmaero.com [208.152.224.2]) by guelah.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.1) with ESMTP id gAE5iox10028 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 05:44:51 GMT Received: from localhost (jlewis@localhost) by redhat1.mmaero.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id gAE5inT31858 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 00:44:49 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: redhat1.mmaero.com: jlewis owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 00:44:49 -0500 (EST) From: jlewis@lewis.org X-X-Sender: jlewis@redhat1.mmaero.com To: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Subject: parts of config missing, then back Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk I've noticed an occasional bug, where for some reason rancid will lose large parts of a config (seems to only happen on Cisco AS5200's so far). Eventually, the missing config (or parts of it) comes back. i.e. In the past couple of runs for one particular 5248, first 70 lines of config vanish (everything in interface Ethernet0 other than the interface name, most of interface Virtual-Template1, and the entire sections for interfaces serial0, serial1, serial0:23, and serial1:23). Some number of runs later, the serial interfaces return, but the missing config data from Ethernet0 and Virtual-Template1 are still gone. I'm running do-diffs hourly, so somehow the same incomplete config is downloaded multiple times before returning to normal. Anyone seen this before? Revision 1.4 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Thu Nov 14 05:15:36 2002 UTC (16 minutes, 31 seconds ago) by rancid Branch: MAIN CVS Tags: HEAD Changes since 1.3: +42 -0 lines Diff to previous 1.3 (colored) Revision 1.3 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Thu Nov 14 02:16:12 2002 UTC (3 hours, 15 minutes ago) by rancid Branch: MAIN Changes since 1.2: +0 -70 lines Diff to previous 1.2 (colored) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis *jlewis@lewis.org*| I route System Administrator | therefore you are Atlantic Net | _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________ From owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Thu Nov 14 05:53:50 2002 Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAE5roe06631 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 05:53:50 GMT Received: (from majordom@localhost) by guelah.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.1) id gAE5rkO10117 for rancid-discuss-outgoing; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 05:53:46 GMT Received: (from heas@localhost) by guelah.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.1) id gAE5rgN10112; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 05:53:42 GMT Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 05:53:42 +0000 From: john heasley To: jlewis@lewis.org Cc: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Subject: Re: parts of config missing, then back Message-ID: <20021114055342.B9736@shrubbery.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from jlewis@lewis.org on Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 12:44:49AM -0500 X-note: live free, or die! X-homer: mmmm, forbidden doughnut. Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk i've seen boxes that ommit their configs at random. usually related to memory shortage. if you cant get it to do it manually, i'd suggest setting NOPIPE=YES in bin/env and add a cronjob that copies the 5200_hostname.raw file to a separate_dir/5200_hostname.raw.time. so you can verify that its not (or is) rancid or the box. and you can prove it to cisco :) Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 12:44:49AM -0500, jlewis@lewis.org: > I've noticed an occasional bug, where for some reason rancid will lose > large parts of a config (seems to only happen on Cisco AS5200's so far). > Eventually, the missing config (or parts of it) comes back. i.e. > > In the past couple of runs for one particular 5248, first 70 lines of > config vanish (everything in interface Ethernet0 other than the interface > name, most of interface Virtual-Template1, and the entire sections for > interfaces serial0, serial1, serial0:23, and serial1:23). Some number of > runs later, the serial interfaces return, but the missing config data from > Ethernet0 and Virtual-Template1 are still gone. I'm running do-diffs > hourly, so somehow the same incomplete config is downloaded multiple times > before returning to normal. > > Anyone seen this before? > > Revision 1.4 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Thu Nov 14 > 05:15:36 2002 UTC (16 minutes, 31 seconds ago) by rancid > Branch: MAIN > CVS Tags: HEAD > Changes since 1.3: +42 -0 lines > Diff to previous 1.3 (colored) > > Revision 1.3 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Thu Nov 14 > 02:16:12 2002 UTC (3 hours, 15 minutes ago) by rancid > Branch: MAIN > Changes since 1.2: +0 -70 lines > Diff to previous 1.2 (colored) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Jon Lewis *jlewis@lewis.org*| I route > System Administrator | therefore you are > Atlantic Net | > _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________ From owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Thu Nov 14 14:56:19 2002 Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAEEuJe24636 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 14:56:19 GMT Received: (from majordom@localhost) by guelah.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.1) id gAEErUS14204 for rancid-discuss-outgoing; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 14:53:30 GMT Received: from redhat1.mmaero.com (IDENT:root@redhat1.mmaero.com [208.152.224.2]) by guelah.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.1) with ESMTP id gAEErPx14197; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 14:53:26 GMT Received: from localhost (jlewis@localhost) by redhat1.mmaero.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id gAEErO002529; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 09:53:24 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: redhat1.mmaero.com: jlewis owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 09:53:24 -0500 (EST) From: jlewis@lewis.org X-X-Sender: jlewis@redhat1.mmaero.com To: john heasley cc: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Subject: Re: parts of config missing, then back In-Reply-To: <20021114055342.B9736@shrubbery.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, john heasley wrote: > i've seen boxes that ommit their configs at random. usually related > to memory shortage. That would be it. Good old MS IOS leaking memory. tampflxa-as-6>show mem Head Total(b) Used(b) Free(b) Lowest(b) Largest(b) Processor 99B04 7759100 7759060 40 0 40 I/O 20000000 4194304 3716388 477916 466180 128844 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis *jlewis@lewis.org*| I route System Administrator | therefore you are Atlantic Net | _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________ From owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Thu Nov 14 19:31:20 2002 Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAEJVKe03366 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 19:31:20 GMT Received: (from majordom@localhost) by guelah.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.1) id gAEJSEs15943 for rancid-discuss-outgoing; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 19:28:14 GMT Received: (from heas@localhost) by guelah.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.1) id gAEJSBI15937 for rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 19:28:12 GMT Received: from evil.ki.iif.hu (evil.ki.iif.hu [193.225.13.42]) by guelah.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.1) with SMTP id gAE87Wx11437 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 08:07:32 GMT Received: (qmail 38789 invoked by uid 1023); 14 Nov 2002 08:07:29 -0000 Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 09:07:29 +0100 (CET) From: Janos Mohacsi X-X-Sender: mohacsi@evil.ki.iif.hu To: Robert Brewer cc: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Subject: Re: RANCID indiscretion In-Reply-To: <4997596.1037179415@habanero.lava.net> Message-ID: <20021114090537.F5664-100000@evil.ki.iif.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Robert Brewer wrote: > I've noticed that for our Juniper M5s, RANCID insists on including > encrypted passwords in email diffs. I know that for some config fields on > some devices, RANCID knows to censor the email, but that doesn't seem to > happen for JUNOS: Not the e-mail censored, but the config file can be stored in secured way: Set up FILTER_PWDS=ALL; export FILTER_PWDS in your rancid env file. By default passwords are not filtered. Janos Mohacsi From owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Thu Nov 14 19:32:45 2002 Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAEJWje03689 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 19:32:45 GMT Received: (from majordom@localhost) by guelah.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.1) id gAEJWg216016 for rancid-discuss-outgoing; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 19:32:43 GMT Received: (from heas@localhost) by guelah.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.1) id gAEJWeA16010 for rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 19:32:40 GMT Received: from txsmtp01.texas.rr.com (smtp1.texas.rr.com [24.93.36.229]) by guelah.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.1) with ESMTP id gAEEOsx14036 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 14:24:54 GMT Received: from usd25445 (cs2427113-6.houston.rr.com [24.27.113.6]) by txsmtp01.texas.rr.com (8.12.5/8.12.2) with SMTP id gAEEMEuE002722 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 09:22:15 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <019901c28be9$971790a0$06711b18@usd25445> Reply-To: "Bill Rowan" From: "Bill Rowan" To: Subject: Daily Flash problems Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 08:24:49 -0600 Organization: RoadRunner MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0196_01C28BB7.4C3B83C0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0196_01C28BB7.4C3B83C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have a fairly large deployment of Cisco routers that I use RANCID to = track daily diffs. The problem I have is that RANCID will tell me = random routers have no flash one day and then the next day all the flash = contents will be back again. I am running RANCID on 71 ubr7246's and 17 = 120xx GSRs. I am not sure if the problem is happening on the GSRs. I = have looked through about a month's worth of data and all I see is the = problem occuring on the uBRs. Here is a sample of what I am talking = about: - !Flash: No files on device + !Flash: -#- ED --type-- --crc--- -seek-- nlen -length- = -----date/time------ name + !Flash: 1 .. image CCD17FFF 66F690 29 6616592 Mar 06 2001 = 21:14:54 ubr7200-k1ps-mz.120-14.SC.bin + !Flash: 2 .. image C233DAB0 F752A8 30 9460632 Dec 08 2001 = 17:21:45 ubr7200-ik1s-mz.121-9.5.EC.bin + !Flash: 3 .. config EF397E63 F791AC 14 16003 May 20 2002 = 01:14:11 running-config This is from last night's diffs and obviously the files have been there = all along by the time stamp shown. To verify this, I look at the = previous day's diff and see where this router shows: - !Flash: -#- ED --type-- --crc--- -seek-- nlen -length- = -----date/time------ name - !Flash: 1 .. image CCD17FFF 66F690 29 6616592 Mar 06 2001 = 21:14:54 ubr7200-k1ps-mz.120-14.SC.bin - !Flash: 2 .. image C233DAB0 F752A8 30 9460632 Dec 08 2001 = 17:21:45 ubr7200-ik1s-mz.121-9.5.EC.bin - !Flash: 3 .. config EF397E63 F791AC 14 16003 May 20 2002 = 01:14:11 running-config + !Flash: No files on device Like I said, there is no regular pattern to which routers get affected = and it doesn't happen to all of them at once. Some nights 10 to 15 = routers will show this and others only 3 or 4. Ever since I have ran = RANCID, I have seen this. Only now have I decided to complain. :-) Ultimately, I guess I could take out the flash check in RANCID, but I = really like it because it helps me catch core dumps and line card crash = files. However, if nothing can be done to fix this, I would like to = know how to take that out of my diffs. ------=_NextPart_000_0196_01C28BB7.4C3B83C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I have a fairly large deployment of = Cisco routers=20 that I use RANCID to track daily diffs.  The problem I have is that = RANCID=20 will tell me random routers have no flash one day and then the next day = all the=20 flash contents will be back again.  I am running RANCID on 71 = ubr7246's and=20 17 120xx GSRs.  I am not sure if the problem is happening on the=20 GSRs.  I have looked through about a month's worth of data and all = I see is=20 the problem occuring on the uBRs.  Here is a sample of what I am = talking=20 about:
 
- !Flash: No files on device
+ = !Flash: -#- ED=20 --type-- --crc--- -seek-- nlen -length- -----date/time------ name
+ = !Flash:=20 1   .. image    CCD17FFF  = 66F690  =20 29  6616592 Mar 06 2001 21:14:54 ubr7200-k1ps-mz.120-14.SC.bin
+ = !Flash:=20 2   .. image    C233DAB0  = F752A8  =20 30  9460632 Dec 08 2001 17:21:45 = ubr7200-ik1s-mz.121-9.5.EC.bin
+=20 !Flash: 3   .. config   EF397E63  = F791AC  =20 14    16003 May 20 2002 01:14:11 = running-config
 
This is from last night's diffs and = obviously the=20 files have been there all along by the time stamp shown.  To verify = this, I=20 look at the previous day's diff and see where this router = shows:
 
- !Flash: -#- ED --type-- --crc--- = -seek-- nlen=20 -length- -----date/time------ name
- !Flash: 1   ..=20 image    CCD17FFF  66F690   29  = 6616592 Mar=20 06 2001 21:14:54 ubr7200-k1ps-mz.120-14.SC.bin
- !Flash: = 2   ..=20 image    C233DAB0  F752A8   30  = 9460632 Dec=20 08 2001 17:21:45 ubr7200-ik1s-mz.121-9.5.EC.bin
- !Flash: = 3   ..=20 config   EF397E63  F791AC   = 14    16003=20 May 20 2002 01:14:11 running-config
+ !Flash: No files on=20 device
Like I said, there is no regular = pattern to which=20 routers get affected and it doesn't happen to all of them at once.  = Some=20 nights 10 to 15 routers will show this and others only 3 or 4.  = Ever since=20 I have ran RANCID, I have seen this.  Only now have I decided to=20 complain.  :-)
 
Ultimately, I guess I could take out = the flash=20 check in RANCID, but I really like it because it helps me catch core = dumps and=20 line card crash files.  However, if nothing can be done to fix = this, I=20 would like to know how to take that out of my diffs.
 
 
------=_NextPart_000_0196_01C28BB7.4C3B83C0-- From owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Thu Nov 14 21:05:13 2002 Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAEL5Ce06201 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 21:05:12 GMT Received: (from majordom@localhost) by guelah.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.1) id gAEL4WW16555 for rancid-discuss-outgoing; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 21:04:32 GMT Received: (from heas@localhost) by guelah.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.1) id gAEL3Ab16529; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 21:03:10 GMT Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 21:03:10 +0000 From: john heasley To: Janos Mohacsi Cc: Robert Brewer , rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Subject: Re: RANCID indiscretion Message-ID: <20021114210309.N15432@shrubbery.net> References: <4997596.1037179415@habanero.lava.net> <20021114090537.F5664-100000@evil.ki.iif.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20021114090537.F5664-100000@evil.ki.iif.hu>; from mohacsi@niif.hu on Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 09:07:29AM +0100 X-note: live free, or die! X-homer: mmmm, forbidden doughnut. Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 09:07:29AM +0100, Janos Mohacsi: > > > On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Robert Brewer wrote: > > > I've noticed that for our Juniper M5s, RANCID insists on including > > encrypted passwords in email diffs. I know that for some config fields on > > some devices, RANCID knows to censor the email, but that doesn't seem to > > happen for JUNOS: > > Not the e-mail censored, but the config file can be stored in secured way: > Set up > FILTER_PWDS=ALL; export FILTER_PWDS > > in your rancid env file. By default passwords are not filtered. > Janos Mohacsi > by default, only easily reversable passwords are filtered. also see the NOCOMMSTR variable in evn(5). From owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Thu Nov 14 21:44:16 2002 Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAELiFe07623 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 21:44:15 GMT Received: (from majordom@localhost) by guelah.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.1) id gAELgCC00508 for rancid-discuss-outgoing; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 21:42:12 GMT Received: from tower.partan.com (tower.partan.com [198.6.255.248]) by guelah.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.1) with ESMTP id gAELg8W00504 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 21:42:08 GMT Received: from tower.partan.com (localhost.partan.com [127.0.0.1]) by tower.partan.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id gAELg0cQ025950; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 16:42:00 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from asp@tower.partan.com) Received: (from asp@localhost) by tower.partan.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id gAELg0G1025949; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 16:42:00 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from asp) Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 16:42:00 -0500 From: Andrew Partan To: Bill Rowan Cc: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Subject: Re: Daily Flash problems Message-ID: <20021114214200.GB25771@partan.com> References: <019901c28be9$971790a0$06711b18@usd25445> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <019901c28be9$971790a0$06711b18@usd25445> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 08:24:49AM -0600, Bill Rowan wrote: > Like I said, there is no regular pattern to which routers get > affected and it doesn't happen to all of them at once. Some nights > 10 to 15 routers will show this and others only 3 or 4. Ever since > I have ran RANCID, I have seen this. Only now have I decided to > complain. :-) Looks like a cisco bug to me. Rancid just happens to catch it since it is watching more closely :-) --asp From owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Thu Nov 14 21:59:55 2002 Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAELxte07871 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 21:59:55 GMT Received: (from majordom@localhost) by guelah.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.1) id gAELxmg00664 for rancid-discuss-outgoing; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 21:59:48 GMT Received: from dopey.corp.expertcity.com (66-162-33-182.gen.twtelecom.net [66.162.33.182]) by guelah.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.1) with ESMTP id gAELxjW00660 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 21:59:45 GMT Received: by dopey.corp.expertcity.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2655.55) id ; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 13:59:44 -0800 Message-ID: From: Anshuman Kanwar To: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Subject: netscaler 9000 Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 13:59:44 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2655.55) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk Hi all, I needed rancid to capture configs from netscaler load balancers. (http://www.netscaler.com/product/9000_datasheet.html) To this end I hacked rancid, and added 'nlogin' and 'nrancid' scripts. I would be happy to make them available if there is any interest in the matter. Thanks, -ansh From MccluskeyKen@icqmail.com Fri Nov 15 01:58:29 2002 Received: from smtp03.wxs.nl (smtp03.wxs.nl [195.121.6.37]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAF1wNe14969 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 01:58:28 GMT Message-Id: <200211150158.gAF1wNe14969@ni.shrubbery.net> Received: from 195.121.96.42 ([195.121.96.42]) by smtp03.wxs.nl (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id H5LHGZ01.CVI; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 02:58:11 +0100 From: Beady Schiralli Subject: There's no need to suffer in silence (s01U) To: Darm Omary Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 03:27:50 -0800 Reply-To: hookerhartwigmp8k@yahoo.com X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2300.0000 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.53d) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="5pe5uWt4Blj406Y3gHV2m5leRDbc6---MinemindfxxyfWXb34d2ykc5n007Cxg0RU1P=" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --5pe5uWt4Blj406Y3gHV2m5leRDbc6---MinemindfxxyfWXb34d2ykc5n007Cxg0RU1P= Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Increase Your Sexual Performance Right Now!
Take control of your sex life, Order Viagra Online Now!

The drug Viagra is a revolutionary way to treat impotence and enhance any man's sex life.

To order online click here

The drug Viagra is a revolutionary way to treat impotence and enhance any man's sex life.

It is a Safe and Effective way to increase a man's libido and has proven to be the most successful treatment for impotence.
No need to go through embarrassing, stressful situations anymore, you can now get Viagra from the comfort of your home!

Some Things to think about...

1) You will not get an erection without sexual stimulation - no need to be embarrassed like when you use other sexual stimulants. You will only gain an erection when you are sexually stimulated.

2) More men use and trust Viagra as a treatment for sexual dysfunction than other sexual stimulation aids. Viagra is a safe sexual treatment that is proven because of the wide use and acceptance by the general public.

3) When you use Viagra you are able to gain an erection through your partners sexual stimulation - all of your sexual acts, feelings and your love making is the result of your chemistry.

This is the easiest and most discreet way to
end impotence

To order online click here

It's worked for so many don't waste any more time get started by following the link on this page!
To stop receiving this message reply to this email with the word REMOVE in the subject.
65pe5uWt4Blj406Y3gHV2m5leRDbc6 --5pe5uWt4Blj406Y3gHV2m5leRDbc6---MinemindfxxyfWXb34d2ykc5n007Cxg0RU1P=-- From owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Fri Nov 15 03:31:39 2002 Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAF3Vde17797 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 03:31:39 GMT Received: (from majordom@localhost) by guelah.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.1) id gAF3TsL02351 for rancid-discuss-outgoing; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 03:29:54 GMT Received: from tower.partan.com (tower.partan.com [198.6.255.248]) by guelah.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.1) with ESMTP id gAF3TpW02347 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 03:29:51 GMT Received: from tower.partan.com (localhost.partan.com [127.0.0.1]) by tower.partan.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id gAF3TicQ047148; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 22:29:44 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from asp@tower.partan.com) Received: (from asp@localhost) by tower.partan.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id gAF3TiQF047147; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 22:29:44 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from asp) Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 22:29:43 -0500 From: Andrew Partan To: Anshuman Kanwar Cc: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Subject: Re: netscaler 9000 Message-ID: <20021115032943.GD46762@partan.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 01:59:44PM -0800, Anshuman Kanwar wrote: > I needed rancid to capture configs from netscaler load balancers. > (http://www.netscaler.com/product/9000_datasheet.html) > > To this end I hacked rancid, and added 'nlogin' and 'nrancid' scripts. I > would be happy to make them available if there is any interest in the > matter. I have never heard of a netscaler, but we would be happy to take your patches & try to incorporate them into the rancid base. Note that we usually try to make minor patches to clogin to make it work with a new router instead of spawning yet another login script. Send them to rancid@shrubbery.net --asp From owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Sun Nov 24 23:27:29 2002 Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAONRT124503 for ; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 23:27:29 GMT Received: (from majordom@localhost) by guelah.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.1) id gAONNHp15997 for rancid-discuss-outgoing; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 23:23:17 GMT Received: (from heas@localhost) by guelah.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.1) id gAONNDU15992; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 23:23:13 GMT Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 15:23:13 -0800 From: john heasley To: Bill Rowan Cc: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Subject: Re: Daily Flash problems Message-ID: <20021124152312.H4097@shrubbery.net> References: <019901c28be9$971790a0$06711b18@usd25445> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <019901c28be9$971790a0$06711b18@usd25445>; from browan@houston.rr.com on Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 08:24:49AM -0600 X-note: live free, or die! X-homer: awe, not the good cheek Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 08:24:49AM -0600, Bill Rowan: > I have a fairly large deployment of Cisco routers that I use RANCID to track daily diffs. The problem I have is that RANCID will tell me random routers have no flash one day and then the next day all the flash contents will be back again. I am running RANCID on 71 ubr7246's and 17 120xx GSRs. I am not sure if the problem is happening on the GSRs. I have looked through about a month's worth of data and all I see is the problem occuring on the uBRs. Here is a sample of what I am talking about: > > - !Flash: No files on device > + !Flash: -#- ED --type-- --crc--- -seek-- nlen -length- -----date/time------ name > + !Flash: 1 .. image CCD17FFF 66F690 29 6616592 Mar 06 2001 21:14:54 ubr7200-k1ps-mz.120-14.SC.bin > + !Flash: 2 .. image C233DAB0 F752A8 30 9460632 Dec 08 2001 17:21:45 ubr7200-ik1s-mz.121-9.5.EC.bin > + !Flash: 3 .. config EF397E63 F791AC 14 16003 May 20 2002 01:14:11 running-config > > > This is from last night's diffs and obviously the files have been there all along by the time stamp shown. To verify this, I look at the previous day's diff and see where this router shows: > > - !Flash: -#- ED --type-- --crc--- -seek-- nlen -length- -----date/time------ name > - !Flash: 1 .. image CCD17FFF 66F690 29 6616592 Mar 06 2001 21:14:54 ubr7200-k1ps-mz.120-14.SC.bin > - !Flash: 2 .. image C233DAB0 F752A8 30 9460632 Dec 08 2001 17:21:45 ubr7200-ik1s-mz.121-9.5.EC.bin > - !Flash: 3 .. config EF397E63 F791AC 14 16003 May 20 2002 01:14:11 running-config > + !Flash: No files on device > > Like I said, there is no regular pattern to which routers get affected and it doesn't happen to all of them at once. Some nights 10 to 15 routers will show this and others only 3 or 4. Ever since I have ran RANCID, I have seen this. Only now have I decided to complain. :-) > > Ultimately, I guess I could take out the flash check in RANCID, but I really like it because it helps me catch core dumps and line card crash files. However, if nothing can be done to fix this, I would like to know how to take that out of my diffs. i agree with andrew; ios bug. if you wanted to have rancid re-collect when there the flash has zero files, return 1 from DirSlot/ShowFlash when it sees "No files on device". it should give up and try again.