From owner-rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Thu Oct 16 17:35:45 2003 Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9GHZjN04272 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 17:35:45 GMT Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) id 93D2C17CFA4; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 17:35:44 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 10007) id 809C717D07C; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 17:35:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Received: from CSTAWA01.USIPLUMTREE.AD (cstawa01.usi.net [209.62.141.21]) by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0EEE17CFA4 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 17:35:42 +0000 (UTC) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: how use an edited version of cat5rancid Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 10:36:51 -0700 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: how use an edited version of cat5rancid Thread-Index: AcOUC+wDnxGjUZpMQlGRSeHoAhrZqQ== From: "Jason Truong" To: Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ni.shrubbery.net id h9GHZjN04272 Hello, I have successfully installed rancid and it working great for some of my Cisco switches. The ones that work are for the Cisco Catalyst 4003. I have a bunch of Catalyst 3548s that don't appear to work. In my router.db file I have: cat4003-mez.plumtree.com:cat5:up cat4003-2nd.plumtree.com:cat5:up cat4003-3rd.plumtree.com:cat5:up cat4006-server.plumtree.com:cat5:up cat3548-2nd.plumtree.com:cat5:up cat3548-3rd.plumtree.com:cat5:up cat3548-svr-sw1.plumtree.com:cat5:up cat3548-svr-sw2.plumtree.com:cat5:up cat3548-svr-sw3.plumtree.com:cat5:up cat3548-svr-sw4.plumtree.com:cat5:up So I am using "cat5" for mfg for my cisco catalyst switches. However, when I run do-diffs, nothing happens for the cat3548s. When I run rancid or cat5rancid (for debugging) I get errors. Basically, some of the called commands from the scripts don't work .. ie [rancid@Nagios bin]$ ./cat5rancid -d cat3548-2nd.plumtree.com executing clogin -t 90 -c"show version;show boot;show flash;dir bootflash:;dir slot0:;dir slot1:;dir sup-bootflash:;dir sup-microcode:;show module;show port ifindex;write term" cat3548-2nd.plumtree.com cat3548-2nd.plumtree.com: missed cmd(s): show port ifindex,show module,dir sup-microcode:,dir sup-bootflash:,dir bootflash:,dir slot0:,show version,show flash,write term,show boot,dir slot1: cat3548-2nd.plumtree.com: missed cmd(s): show port ifindex,show module,dir sup-microcode:,dir sup-bootflash:,dir bootflash:,dir slot0:,show version,show flash,write term,show boot,dir slot1: cat3548-2nd.plumtree.com: End of run not found cat3548-2nd.plumtree.com: End of run not found Some of the commands mention above dont' work. It appears that cat5rancid does not output anything if any of the commands don't work while rancid at least spits out whatever it can find. So my questions are: - how do we know if rancid or cat5rancid is called? (should I use cisco as the mfg in my router.db file?) - how do we get rancid to call an edited version of any of these scripts? thanks, Jason T. From owner-rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Thu Oct 16 19:29:58 2003 Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9GJTwN06467 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 19:29:58 GMT Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) id A955417D07E; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 19:29:57 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 10007) id 8BFA417D0A9; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 19:29:57 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Received: from paeroa.ipg.tsnz.net (paeroa.ipg.tsnz.net [203.97.244.50]) by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F0EC17D07E for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 19:29:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from spurdog.ipg.tsnz.net ([203.97.244.48]) by paeroa.ipg.tsnz.net with esmtp (Exim 3.32 #9) id 1AADoo-00096R-00 for rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net; Fri, 17 Oct 2003 08:29:54 +1300 Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 08:29:54 +1300 (NZDT) From: Sid Jones X-X-Sender: sjones@spurdog.ipg.tsnz.net To: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Subject: Session 1 on a 2900 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk Has anybody already done anything to connect to [for example] an ATM daughter card in 2900 and scrape the config of that off as well as the runnig config on the base switch? From owner-rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Thu Oct 16 19:41:15 2003 Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9GJfEN06753 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 19:41:14 GMT Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) id 4F19D17D0A9; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 19:41:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 10007) id 3AD2F17D30B; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 19:41:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Received: from tower.partan.com (tower.partan.com [198.6.255.248]) by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D1817D0A9 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 19:41:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tower.partan.com (localhost.partan.com [127.0.0.1]) by tower.partan.com (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h9GJfAgq054303; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 15:41:10 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from asp@tower.partan.com) Received: (from asp@localhost) by tower.partan.com (8.12.8p2/8.12.8/Submit) id h9GJf5ea054300; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 15:41:05 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from asp) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 15:41:05 -0400 From: Andrew Partan To: Jason Truong Cc: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Subject: Re: how use an edited version of cat5rancid Message-ID: <20031016194105.GA53829@partan.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 10:36:51AM -0700, Jason Truong wrote: > So I am using "cat5" for mfg for my cisco catalyst switches. > However, when I run do-diffs, nothing happens for the cat3548s. > When I run rancid or cat5rancid (for debugging) I get errors. > Basically, some of the called commands from the scripts don't work I never remember which ciscos are best done with type 'cisco' (rancid) or type 'cat5' (cat5rancid). I usually use rancid 1st, and if that fails, then use cat5rancid. [See bin/rancid-fe for the bit that goes from type to program.] In any case, the 'missed cmds' message means that the program (cat5rancid in this case) has problems logging into the router & could not run all of the commands. The programs deal with 'command not found' or 'invalid command' just fine; its when they can't even run the commands that they complain about missed commands. So I'd look into why you can't log into the router & run commands. Can you use clogin to log into the routers having problems? Can you run some commands with: clogin -c "show version;show version" rtr1 without problems? Btw, the missed commands that you listed are *all* of the commands that cat5rancid is trying to run - i.e.: it was unable to run any of them. --asp From owner-rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Thu Oct 16 19:44:44 2003 Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9GJihN06766 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 19:44:43 GMT Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) id 6992517D30B; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 19:44:43 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 10007) id 2DC1317D331; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 19:44:43 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Received: from P69MS211.portseattle.org (exch2.portseattle.org [198.134.100.57]) by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D16E17D30B for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 19:44:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 172.16.100.118 by P69MS211.portseattle.org (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Thu, 16 Oct 2003 12:45:13 -0700 Received: from p69ms120.portseattle.org ([172.16.100.33]) by p69ms189.portseattle.org with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 16 Oct 2003 12:44:40 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: Special Characters Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 12:44:39 -0700 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Special Characters Thread-Index: AcOUHe/mMQlFNqCsRWWC0X0qVux8qw== From: "Krueger, Brian" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Oct 2003 19:44:40.0190 (UTC) FILETIME=[F03B81E0:01C3941D] Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ni.shrubbery.net id h9GJihN06766 Has anybody run into problems when using special characters with passwords? When I try to run .cloginrc it gives me this (password characters have been changed): Bareword found where operator expected at .cloginrc line 70, near "$ add autoenable" (Missing operator before autoenable?) Number found where operator expected at .cloginrc line 70, near "org 01" (Do you need to predeclare org?) Semicolon seems to be missing at .cloginrc line 70. Operator or semicolon missing before *step at .cloginrc line 118. Ambiguous use of * resolved as operator *step at .cloginrc line 118. syntax error at .cloginrc line 70, near "$ add autoenable P69" Execution of .cloginrc aborted due to compilation errors. Any help would be greatly appreciated BK krueger.b@portseattle.org From owner-rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Thu Oct 16 19:48:35 2003 Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9GJmZN06863 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 19:48:35 GMT Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) id 4E35017D07C; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 19:48:35 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 10007) id 32D3817D330; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 19:48:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Received: from nt_exchange.fusiontel.com (216-199-153-35.ftl.fdn.com [216.199.153.35]) by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A8317D07C for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 19:48:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by exchange.fusiontel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) id ; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 15:47:36 -0400 Message-ID: From: Joshua Sahala To: "'Krueger, Brian'" , rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Subject: RE: Special Characters Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 15:47:36 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk you have to escape the '$' character, so if your password is $3 >-----Original Message----- > >From: Krueger, Brian [mailto:krueger.b@portseattle.org] > >Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 15:45 > >To: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net > >Subject: Special Characters > > > > > >Has anybody run into problems when using special characters > >with passwords? When I try to run .cloginrc it gives me this > >(password characters have been changed): > > > >Bareword found where operator expected at .cloginrc line 70, near "$ > >add autoenable" > > (Missing operator before autoenable?) > >Number found where operator expected at .cloginrc line 70, > >near "org 01" > > (Do you need to predeclare org?) > >Semicolon seems to be missing at .cloginrc line 70. > >Operator or semicolon missing before *step at .cloginrc line 118. > >Ambiguous use of * resolved as operator *step at .cloginrc line 118. > >syntax error at .cloginrc line 70, near "$ > >add autoenable P69" > >Execution of .cloginrc aborted due to compilation errors. > > > >Any help would be greatly appreciated > > > >BK > >krueger.b@portseattle.org > > From owner-rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Thu Oct 16 19:49:28 2003 Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9GJnSN06873 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 19:49:28 GMT Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) id 7077B17D330; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 19:49:28 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 10007) id 5058317D332; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 19:49:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Received: from server.tmk.com (server.tmk.com [204.141.35.63]) by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DBE917D330 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 19:49:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tmk.com by tmk.com (PMDF V6.2-X17 #37010) id <01L1WGYP35LC000NR6@tmk.com> for rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 15:49:24 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 15:42:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Terry Kennedy Subject: Re: how use an edited version of cat5rancid In-reply-to: "Your message dated Thu, 16 Oct 2003 15:41:05 -0400" <20031016194105.GA53829@partan.com> To: Andrew Partan Cc: Jason Truong , rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Message-id: <01L1WHD5MCPO000NR6@tmk.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=us-ascii References: Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk > I never remember which ciscos are best done with type 'cisco' > (rancid) or type 'cat5' (cat5rancid). I usually use rancid 1st, > and if that fails, then use cat5rancid. [See bin/rancid-fe for the > bit that goes from type to program.] If it runs IOS, use "cisco". If it runs CatOS, use "cat5". I probably should have put a check in cat5rancid to see if the target device was running IOS and return a "you're using the wrong device type" error, but cat5rancid was originally a hack for my own use only. A switch running in hybrid mode should be treated like a C5K with an attached RSM - separate router.db entries, one of type "cat5" for the switch and one of type "cisco" for the router. Native mode switches only need a single "cisco" entry for the whole switch/router combo. Similarly, any module that you get to with the "session" command is running a private copy of IOS and should be configured as a separate entry in router.db of type "cisco". Terry Kennedy http://www.tmk.com terry@tmk.com New York, NY USA From owner-rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Thu Oct 16 19:51:06 2003 Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9GJp6N06970 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 19:51:06 GMT Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) id 9FB9717D332; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 19:51:06 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 10007) id 7F9DF17D334; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 19:51:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Received: from tower.partan.com (tower.partan.com [198.6.255.248]) by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6141F17D332 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 19:51:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tower.partan.com (localhost.partan.com [127.0.0.1]) by tower.partan.com (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h9GJotgq057636; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 15:50:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from asp@tower.partan.com) Received: (from asp@localhost) by tower.partan.com (8.12.8p2/8.12.8/Submit) id h9GJotNj057633; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 15:50:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from asp) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 15:50:55 -0400 From: Andrew Partan To: Joshua Sahala Cc: "'Krueger, Brian'" , rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Subject: Re: Special Characters Message-ID: <20031016195055.GA57590@partan.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:47:36PM -0400, Joshua Sahala wrote: > you have to escape the '$' character, so if your password is $3 you would need to put \$3; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 21:40:46 GMT Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) id 08A3117D337; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 21:40:46 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 10007) id DAAB417D33A; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 21:40:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Received: from biola.edu (mail.biola.edu [64.208.12.25]) by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D26D917D337 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 21:40:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.5.4.52] ([10.5.4.52] verified) by biola.edu (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.5) with ESMTP id 29037946 for rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:42:48 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: mark.duling@mail.biola.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:43:37 -0700 To: From: Mark Duling Subject: Re: how use an edited version of cat5rancid Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk >I have successfully installed rancid and it working great for some >of my Cisco switches. >The ones that work are for the Cisco Catalyst 4003. > >I have a bunch of Catalyst 3548s that don't appear to work. >In my router.db file I have: > >So I am using "cat5" for mfg for my cisco catalyst switches. >However, when I run do-diffs, nothing happens for the cat3548s. When >I run rancid or cat5rancid (for debugging) I get errors. Basically, >some of the called commands from the scripts don't work .. ie Catalyst 3548's run IOS so you need to use the 'cisco' RANCID directive. On the other hand, Catalyst 2980's (which are Catalyst 4000 series switches) run CatOS. So just because the model is a Catalyst doesn't mean it is running CatOS. I don't know why the Cisco naming is so convoluted. If a 'show ver' on the switch reveals that the binary OS image starts with 'cat' such as cat4000.6-3-3a.bin then it's running CatOS and you need to use the RANCID directive 'cat5'. Otherwise it is running IOS and needs to use RANCID directive 'cisco'. There may be exceptions to this. That is the way it looks to me based on the Cisco equipment I happen to have. Mark From owner-rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Fri Oct 17 11:56:13 2003 Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9HBuDN26417 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:56:13 GMT Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) id 78FC517D338; Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:56:12 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 10007) id 66D1517D33B; Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:56:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Received: from ntx.netvision.net.il (cs.netvision.net.il [199.203.100.200]) by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52FAC17D338 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:56:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (PineApp-Mail 31023 invoked by uid 0); 17 Oct 2003 13:56:18 +0200 Received: from yuvalba@netvision.net.il by ananas with PineApp-Mail-SeCure-2.50.030820 (2003-10-15/2003-10-16. Clean. Processed in 0.076224 secs); 17/10/2003 13:56:18 Received: from Internal Mail-Server by ananas with SMTP; 17 Oct 2003 13:56:18 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6375.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Subject: false "changes in XXX routers" reports Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 13:55:11 +0200 Message-ID: <070F6E0C1E5E684BAA2DC8C854386D4A01CE4E@ntx.forest.netvision.net.il> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: false "changes in XXX routers" reports Thread-Index: AcOUpaj/+HHBzTjJSGattwqfEeI2Ug== From: "Yuval Ben-Ari" To: Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ni.shrubbery.net id h9HBuDN26417 Hi, I'm getting flase reports of changes in router.db file, such as: Routers changed to up: router1:cisco router2:cisco router3:cisco Added routers: router1:cisco router2:cisco router3:cisco Deleted routers: router1:cisco router2:cisco router3:cisco while there was no change to the routers list file. any idea why this happens? --Yuval From owner-rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Sun Oct 19 22:42:41 2003 Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9JMgfN07930 for ; Sun, 19 Oct 2003 22:42:41 GMT Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) id D864C17D07C; Sun, 19 Oct 2003 22:42:35 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 10007) id C115917D07E; Sun, 19 Oct 2003 22:42:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Received: from mta02ps.bigpond.com (mta02ps.bigpond.com [144.135.25.156]) by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0651B17D07C for ; Sun, 19 Oct 2003 22:42:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from choqolat.org ([144.135.25.69]) by mta02ps.email.bigpond.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.14 (built Mar 18 2003)) with SMTP id <0HN100BV40DWEI@mta02ps.email.bigpond.com> for rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 08:41:56 +1000 (EST) Received: from cpe-144-132-98-173.vic.bigpond.net.au ([144.132.98.173]) by psmam01bpa.bigpond.com(MAM REL_3_3_2d 71/5557457); Mon, 20 Oct 2003 08:41:56 +0000 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 08:40:08 +1000 From: Andrew Fort Subject: Re: Session 1 on a 2900 In-reply-to: To: Sid Jones Cc: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Message-id: <3F9312C8.8000809@choqolat.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20030924 Thunderbird/0.3 References: Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk Sid Jones wrote: > Has anybody already done anything to connect to [for example] an ATM > daughter card in 2900 and scrape the config of that off as well as the > runnig config on the base switch? Not that I'm aware of. If it's just a show command, it's easy to add, otherwise there's a bit more work. If you like, can you show us what the exchange to get that config looks like (from global exec mode on the main switch IOS) (and also, what the 'hostname' line of your switch is)? cheers -afort From owner-rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Mon Oct 20 16:14:08 2003 Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9KGE8N28997 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 16:14:08 GMT Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) id 91B0B17D07E; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 16:14:07 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 10007) id 7249A17D0A9; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 16:14:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Received: from tower.partan.com (tower.partan.com [198.6.255.248]) by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F3117D07E for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 16:14:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tower.partan.com (localhost.partan.com [127.0.0.1]) by tower.partan.com (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h9KGE3gq028342; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 12:14:03 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from asp@tower.partan.com) Received: (from asp@localhost) by tower.partan.com (8.12.8p2/8.12.8/Submit) id h9KGE2h3028339; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 12:14:02 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from asp) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 12:14:02 -0400 From: Andrew Partan To: Yuval Ben-Ari Cc: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Subject: Re: false "changes in XXX routers" reports Message-ID: <20031020161402.GA28286@partan.com> References: <070F6E0C1E5E684BAA2DC8C854386D4A01CE4E@ntx.forest.netvision.net.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <070F6E0C1E5E684BAA2DC8C854386D4A01CE4E@ntx.forest.netvision.net.il> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 01:55:11PM +0200, Yuval Ben-Ari wrote: > I'm getting flase reports of changes in router.db file, such as: Rancid remembers which routers were up or down in rancid/$GROUP/routers.up & .down. If this file is being deleted or can't be written to or created by the user running rancid, you might get these problems. --asp From owner-rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Mon Oct 20 20:45:05 2003 Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9KKj5N05018 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 20:45:05 GMT Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) id 56FB217D30B; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 20:45:05 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 10007) id 34D7B17D330; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 20:45:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Received: from P69MS211.portseattle.org (exch2.portseattle.org [198.134.100.57]) by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) with SMTP id F07AE17D30B for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 20:45:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 172.16.100.118 by P69MS211.portseattle.org (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Mon, 20 Oct 2003 13:45:27 -0700 Received: from p69ms120.portseattle.org ([172.16.100.33]) by p69ms189.portseattle.org with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Mon, 20 Oct 2003 13:44:49 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: RE: Special Characters Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 13:44:47 -0700 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Special Characters Thread-Index: AcOUHtXfHFjwBvJBS+mWdwIexevd8wDIKxew From: "Krueger, Brian" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Oct 2003 20:44:49.0443 (UTC) FILETIME=[012ACF30:01C3974B] Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ni.shrubbery.net id h9KKj5N05018 I think I'm doing something wrong. I added {} to .cloginrc and ran it, it still gave me output saying: [root@p69rh186 rancid]# perl .cloginrc Array found where operator expected at .cloginrc line 69, at end of line Semicolon seems to be missing at .cloginrc line 69. Number found where operator expected at .cloginrc line 70, near "Core1 1" (Do you need to predeclare Core1?) Semicolon seems to be missing at .cloginrc line 70. Operator or semicolon missing before &step at .cloginrc line 71. Ambiguous use of & resolved as operator & at .cloginrc line 71. syntax error at .cloginrc line 70, near "r0und@} " Missing right curly or square bracket at .cloginrc line 118, at end of line Execution of .cloginrc aborted due to compilation errors. Here's my .cloginrc script (at least it's all that's not commented out) add user P69-Core1 jb3 add password P69-Core1 {r0und@} add autoenable P69-Core1 1 add password t91-wanrtr {l00k&step} -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Partan [mailto:asp@partan.com] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 12:51 PM To: Joshua Sahala Cc: Krueger, Brian; rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Subject: Re: Special Characters On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:47:36PM -0400, Joshua Sahala wrote: > you have to escape the '$' character, so if your password is $3 you would need to put \$3; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 21:09:21 GMT Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) id 4972B17CFA4; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 21:09:21 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 10007) id 2DBBF17D0A9; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 21:09:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Received: from tower.partan.com (tower.partan.com [198.6.255.248]) by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBA1A17CFA4 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 21:09:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tower.partan.com (localhost.partan.com [127.0.0.1]) by tower.partan.com (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h9KL9Hgq049173; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 17:09:17 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from asp@tower.partan.com) Received: (from asp@localhost) by tower.partan.com (8.12.8p2/8.12.8/Submit) id h9KL9HeH049170; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 17:09:17 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from asp) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 17:09:17 -0400 From: Andrew Partan To: "Krueger, Brian" Cc: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Subject: Re: Special Characters Message-ID: <20031020210917.GA49144@partan.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 01:44:47PM -0700, Krueger, Brian wrote: > [root@p69rh186 rancid]# perl .cloginrc Its not a perl program. Its an expect script sourced by the *login scripts. --asp From owner-rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Mon Oct 20 21:16:22 2003 Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9KLGMN05719 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 21:16:22 GMT Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) id AE58517D07D; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 21:16:21 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 10007) id 9317017D32E; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 21:16:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Received: from P69MS211.portseattle.org (exch2.portseattle.org [198.134.100.57]) by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 4366817D07D for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 21:16:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 172.16.100.118 by P69MS211.portseattle.org (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Mon, 20 Oct 2003 14:16:51 -0700 Received: from p69ms120.portseattle.org ([172.16.100.33]) by p69ms189.portseattle.org with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Mon, 20 Oct 2003 14:16:12 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: RE: Special Characters Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 14:16:11 -0700 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Special Characters Thread-Index: AcOXTnGDXlGHcuA0TcW8PayI2Cjh3gAAOeWw From: "Krueger, Brian" To: "Andrew Partan" Cc: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Oct 2003 21:16:13.0031 (UTC) FILETIME=[63DF8770:01C3974F] Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ni.shrubbery.net id h9KLGMN05719 Ok, so how would I test it? -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Partan [mailto:asp@partan.com] Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 2:09 PM To: Krueger, Brian Cc: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Subject: Re: Special Characters On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 01:44:47PM -0700, Krueger, Brian wrote: > [root@p69rh186 rancid]# perl .cloginrc Its not a perl program. Its an expect script sourced by the *login scripts. --asp From owner-rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Mon Oct 20 21:22:44 2003 Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9KLMiN05827 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 21:22:44 GMT Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) id 89A1B17D07D; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 21:22:43 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 10007) id 7360E17D330; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 21:22:43 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Received: from tower.partan.com (tower.partan.com [198.6.255.248]) by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A74617D07D for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 21:22:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tower.partan.com (localhost.partan.com [127.0.0.1]) by tower.partan.com (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h9KLMegq049407; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 17:22:40 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from asp@tower.partan.com) Received: (from asp@localhost) by tower.partan.com (8.12.8p2/8.12.8/Submit) id h9KLMegC049404; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 17:22:40 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from asp) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 17:22:40 -0400 From: Andrew Partan To: "Krueger, Brian" Cc: Andrew Partan , rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Subject: Re: Special Characters Message-ID: <20031020212239.GA49379@partan.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 02:16:11PM -0700, Krueger, Brian wrote: > Ok, so how would I test it? Try logging into the router with the appropriate *login script. e.g.: clogin P69-Core1 clogin t91-wanrtr [or jlogin for junipers or ...] --asp From owner-rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Mon Oct 20 22:37:30 2003 Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9KMbUN07330 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 22:37:30 GMT Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) id BC9EF17D0AA; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 22:37:29 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 10007) id A083117D330; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 22:37:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Received: from paeroa.ipg.tsnz.net (paeroa.ipg.tsnz.net [203.97.244.50]) by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D13317D0AA for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 22:37:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from spurdog.ipg.tsnz.net ([203.97.244.48]) by paeroa.ipg.tsnz.net with esmtp (Exim 3.32 #9) id 1ABidx-000LPF-00; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 11:36:53 +1300 Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 11:36:53 +1300 (NZDT) From: Sid Jones X-X-Sender: sjones@spurdog.ipg.tsnz.net To: Andrew Fort Cc: Sid Jones , rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Subject: Re: Session 1 on a 2900 In-Reply-To: <3F9312C8.8000809@choqolat.org> Message-ID: References: <3F9312C8.8000809@choqolat.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Andrew Fort wrote: > Sid Jones wrote: > > Has anybody already done anything to connect to [for example] an ATM > > daughter card in 2900 and scrape the config of that off as well as the > > runnig config on the base switch? > > Not that I'm aware of. If it's just a show command, it's easy to add, > otherwise there's a bit more work. If you like, can you show us what > the exchange to get that config looks like (from global exec mode on the > main switch IOS) (and also, what the 'hostname' line of your switch is)? switch>enable Password: switch#session 1 Entering Console for module in slot 1 Type "^G" to end this session Press RETURN to get started! switch.ATM>en switch.ATM# switch.ATM#exit Disconnecting from slot 1 Connection Duration: 00:01:36 switch# From owner-rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Tue Oct 21 01:38:43 2003 Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9L1chN10928 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 01:38:43 GMT Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) id 69E0B17D0AA; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 01:38:43 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 10007) id 45C0717D330; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 01:38:43 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Received: from granite.smiller.org (12-252-174-33.client.attbi.com [12.252.174.33]) by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D79E17D0AA for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 01:38:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from granite.unknow (IDENT:1000@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by granite.smiller.org (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id h9KNQuIt020798; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 17:26:57 -0600 From: "Stephen Miller" To: Sid Jones , Andrew Fort Cc: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Subject: Re: Session 1 on a 2900 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 16:26:56 -0700 Message-Id: <20031020231213.M82041@smiller.org> In-Reply-To: References: <3F9312C8.8000809@choqolat.org> X-Mailer: Open WebMail 2.10 20030720 X-OriginatingIP: 192.168.1.101 (steve) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk of course it's doable...but the question is how far to dig into it. if you just need to start gathering the daughter card configs right away...then you can copy and modify a login and rancid scripts to just log into the daughter cards on each device. You would need to create a new group for them....but since there can be more than one daughter card per device...you would need to make the rancid script iterate through all the daughter cards on the device...this would be a bit more complex. if you want the full blown, gather all the card configs and put them under each device...keeping with standard CVS structure...then this would take much more effort than the one above. Here would be issues with password of the daughter card in cloginrc, checking the total number of cards in the device, etc...this could be another sub within rancid.. just throwing this out there...to see what other options there are. Modifying a login and rancid script to just gather the configs from a daughter card should be pretty straight-forward. But trying to iterate through more than one card on the device...not sure...would have to take a closer look at rancid since that is where it should be done at. sorry not more help...just talking out loud ;-) steve ---------- Original Message ----------- From: Sid Jones To: Andrew Fort Cc: Sid Jones , rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Sent: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 11:36:53 +1300 (NZDT) Subject: Re: Session 1 on a 2900 > On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Andrew Fort wrote: > > > Sid Jones wrote: > > > Has anybody already done anything to connect to [for example] an ATM > > > daughter card in 2900 and scrape the config of that off as well as the > > > runnig config on the base switch? > > > > Not that I'm aware of. If it's just a show command, it's easy to add, > > otherwise there's a bit more work. If you like, can you show us what > > the exchange to get that config looks like (from global exec mode on the > > main switch IOS) (and also, what the 'hostname' line of your switch is)? > > switch>enable > Password: > switch#session 1 > Entering Console for module in slot 1 > Type "^G" to end this session > > Press RETURN to get started! > > switch.ATM>en > switch.ATM# > switch.ATM#exit > > Disconnecting from slot 1 > Connection Duration: 00:01:36 > > switch# ------- End of Original Message ------- From owner-rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Tue Oct 21 14:52:20 2003 Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9LEqKN27086 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 14:52:20 GMT Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) id 68FD217CFA4; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 14:52:19 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 10007) id D731517D07C; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 14:52:18 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Received: from ntx.netvision.net.il (cs.netvision.net.il [199.203.100.200]) by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D4C17CFA4 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 14:52:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (PineApp-Mail 12677 invoked by uid 0); 21 Oct 2003 16:52:20 +0200 Received: from yuvalba@netvision.net.il by ananas with PineApp-Mail-SeCure-2.50.030820 (2003-10-20/2003-10-21. Clean. Processed in 0.211714 secs); 21/10/2003 16:52:20 Received: from Internal Mail-Server by ananas with SMTP; 21 Oct 2003 16:52:11 +0200 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: RE: false "changes in XXX routers" reports Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 16:48:02 +0200 Message-ID: <070F6E0C1E5E684BAA2DC8C854386D4A01CE8A@ntx.forest.netvision.net.il> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: false "changes in XXX routers" reports Thread-index: AcOXJT7+YEBQ96lwQDKTY5ondYPuugAvMu3Q From: "Yuval Ben-Ari" To: "Andrew Partan" Cc: Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ni.shrubbery.net id h9LEqKN27086 thanks, rancid is run as cron job of user "rancid" whom has permissions to write to the files. also, the problem happens randomly and I can't find any pattern here. > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Partan [mailto:asp@partan.com] > Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 6:14 PM > To: Yuval Ben-Ari > Cc: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net > Subject: Re: false "changes in XXX routers" reports > > > On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 01:55:11PM +0200, Yuval Ben-Ari wrote: > > I'm getting flase reports of changes in router.db file, such as: > > Rancid remembers which routers were up or down in > rancid/$GROUP/routers.up > & .down. If this file is being deleted or can't be written to or > created by the user running rancid, you might get these problems. > --asp > > From owner-rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Tue Oct 21 14:58:59 2003 Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9LEwxN27113 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 14:58:59 GMT Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) id CB29A17D07D; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 14:58:58 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 10007) id B250517D07C; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 14:58:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 7053) id 157A417CFA5; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 14:58:57 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 14:58:56 +0000 From: john heasley To: Yuval Ben-Ari Cc: Andrew Partan , rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Subject: Re: false "changes in XXX routers" reports Message-ID: <20031021145856.GA22610@shrubbery.net> References: <070F6E0C1E5E684BAA2DC8C854386D4A01CE8A@ntx.forest.netvision.net.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <070F6E0C1E5E684BAA2DC8C854386D4A01CE8A@ntx.forest.netvision.net.il> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-PGPkey: http://www.shrubbery.net/~heas/public-key.asc X-note: live free, or die! X-homer: awe, not the good cheek Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 04:48:02PM +0200, Yuval Ben-Ari: > thanks, > > rancid is run as cron job of user "rancid" whom has permissions to write > to the files. > also, the problem happens randomly and I can't find any pattern here. iirc, when control_rancid runs, it actually uses temporary files which are renamed to routers.{up,down}. so, the directory must also be writable. your safest bet/fix is likely; # cd ~rancid # chown -R rancid . > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Andrew Partan [mailto:asp@partan.com] > > Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 6:14 PM > > To: Yuval Ben-Ari > > Cc: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net > > Subject: Re: false "changes in XXX routers" reports > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 01:55:11PM +0200, Yuval Ben-Ari wrote: > > > I'm getting flase reports of changes in router.db file, such as: > > > > Rancid remembers which routers were up or down in > > rancid/$GROUP/routers.up > > & .down. If this file is being deleted or can't be written to or > > created by the user running rancid, you might get these problems. > > --asp > > > > > From owner-rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Wed Oct 22 08:17:05 2003 Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9M8H5N21280 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 08:17:05 GMT Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) id 6322417CFA5; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 08:17:04 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 10007) id 3D86A17D07D; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 08:17:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Received: from ntx.netvision.net.il (cs.netvision.net.il [199.203.100.200]) by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2456617D07C for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 08:17:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (PineApp-Mail 24475 invoked by uid 0); 22 Oct 2003 10:17:07 +0200 Received: from yuvalba@netvision.net.il by ananas with PineApp-Mail-SeCure-2.50.030820 (2003-10-20/2003-10-21. Clean. Processed in 0.320264 secs); 22/10/2003 10:17:06 Received: from Internal Mail-Server by ananas with SMTP; 22 Oct 2003 10:17:02 +0200 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: RE: false "changes in XXX routers" reports Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 10:16:41 +0200 Message-ID: <070F6E0C1E5E684BAA2DC8C854386D4A01CE92@ntx.forest.netvision.net.il> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: false "changes in XXX routers" reports Thread-index: AcOX4937Ebd5VNZiR16E/nlKulmOtwAkN5iw From: "Yuval Ben-Ari" To: "john heasley" Cc: "Andrew Partan" , Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ni.shrubbery.net id h9M8H5N21280 done will have to see ...... > -----Original Message----- > From: john heasley [mailto:heas@shrubbery.net] > Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 4:59 PM > To: Yuval Ben-Ari > Cc: Andrew Partan; rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net > Subject: Re: false "changes in XXX routers" reports > > > Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 04:48:02PM +0200, Yuval Ben-Ari: > > thanks, > > > > rancid is run as cron job of user "rancid" whom has > permissions to write > > to the files. > > also, the problem happens randomly and I can't find any > pattern here. > > iirc, when control_rancid runs, it actually uses temporary > files which are > renamed to routers.{up,down}. so, the directory must also be > writable. > > your safest bet/fix is likely; > # cd ~rancid > # chown -R rancid . > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Andrew Partan [mailto:asp@partan.com] > > > Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 6:14 PM > > > To: Yuval Ben-Ari > > > Cc: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net > > > Subject: Re: false "changes in XXX routers" reports > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 01:55:11PM +0200, Yuval Ben-Ari wrote: > > > > I'm getting flase reports of changes in router.db file, such as: > > > > > > Rancid remembers which routers were up or down in > > > rancid/$GROUP/routers.up > > > & .down. If this file is being deleted or can't be written to or > > > created by the user running rancid, you might get these problems. > > > --asp > > > > > > > > > > From owner-rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Wed Oct 29 00:47:59 2003 Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9T0lxN01429 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 00:47:59 GMT Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) id B68B317CFCF; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 16:47:58 -0800 (PST) Delivered-To: rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 10007) id A09C217D07D; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 16:47:58 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Received: from torpedo.monterey.k12.ca.us (smtp.monterey.k12.ca.us [205.155.53.42]) by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C0817CFCF for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 16:47:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from its-xp-az2.monterey.k12.ca.us ([10.10.1.190]) by torpedo.monterey.k12.ca.us (Switch-3.0.4/Switch-3.0.0) with ESMTP id h9T0fxBY006257 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 16:42:00 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.0.20031028164706.03eb06f8@mail.monterey.k12.ca.us> X-Sender: azheng@mail.monterey.k12.ca.us X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 16:48:08 -0800 To: From: Alex Zheng Subject: how to retrieve IOS image using RANCID? In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk Anyone used Rancid to retrieve IOS images from a router? And how if anyone knows? Thanks. Alex From owner-rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Wed Oct 29 01:34:58 2003 Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9T1YwN02441 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 01:34:58 GMT Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) id BCE8217D07D; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 17:34:57 -0800 (PST) Delivered-To: rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 10007) id A6A6517D07F; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 17:34:57 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 7053) id B9DC217D07E; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 17:34:56 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 17:34:56 -0800 From: john heasley To: Alex Zheng Cc: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Subject: Re: how to retrieve IOS image using RANCID? Message-ID: <20031029013456.GK6611@shrubbery.net> References: <6.0.0.22.0.20031028164706.03eb06f8@mail.monterey.k12.ca.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.0.20031028164706.03eb06f8@mail.monterey.k12.ca.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-PGPkey: http://www.shrubbery.net/~heas/public-key.asc X-note: live free, or die! X-homer: awe, not the good cheek Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 04:48:08PM -0800, Alex Zheng: > > Anyone used Rancid to retrieve IOS images from a router? And how if anyone > knows? > > Thanks. > > > Alex You;ll have to provide a better description of what you're trying to do. the two possibility that come to mind of what you might be trying are definitely possible. :) From owner-rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Wed Oct 29 21:24:52 2003 Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9TLOqN28942 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 21:24:52 GMT Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) id 3467617D07D; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 13:24:52 -0800 (PST) Delivered-To: rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 10007) id 1A26C17D07F; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 13:24:52 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Received: from granite.smiller.org (12-252-174-33.client.attbi.com [12.252.174.33]) by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31DC817D07D; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 13:24:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from granite.smiller.org (IDENT:1000@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by granite.smiller.org (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id h9TIvv5j012210; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 11:58:02 -0700 From: "Stephen Miller" To: john heasley , Alex Zheng Cc: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Subject: Re: how to retrieve IOS image using RANCID? Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 11:57:57 -0700 Message-Id: <20031029185338.M92101@smiller.org> In-Reply-To: <20031029013456.GK6611@shrubbery.net> References: <6.0.0.22.0.20031028164706.03eb06f8@mail.monterey.k12.ca.us> <20031029013456.GK6611@shrubbery.net> X-Mailer: Open WebMail 2.10 20030720 X-OriginatingIP: 12.252.174.33 (steve) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk do you want to add the IOS images to CVS? you should be able to...just not sure if you want to...the space could be large depending on how many devices and what the image size is, normally about 8+ megs now. You could just modify a login script and use the -c option with, "copy flash:image ftp://ftpserver", which should do it. Then just cron that....but you wouldn't get the change if one occurred...but you would still have the old and new images. steve ---------- Original Message ----------- From: john heasley To: Alex Zheng Cc: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Sent: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 17:34:56 -0800 Subject: Re: how to retrieve IOS image using RANCID? > Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 04:48:08PM -0800, Alex Zheng: > > > > Anyone used Rancid to retrieve IOS images from a router? And how if anyone > > knows? > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > Alex > > You;ll have to provide a better description of what you're trying to do. > > the two possibility that come to mind of what you might be trying are > definitely possible. :) ------- End of Original Message ------- From owner-rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Thu Oct 30 02:38:25 2003 Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9U2cPN07002 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 02:38:25 GMT Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) id 51F8B17CFCF; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 18:38:25 -0800 (PST) Delivered-To: rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 10007) id 3E0F917D07D; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 18:38:25 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 7053) id 39EF517CFD0; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 18:38:24 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 18:38:23 -0800 From: john heasley To: Forier Zhang Cc: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Subject: Re: bug report---- missed cmd(s): show install active Message-ID: <20031030023823.GO13118@shrubbery.net> References: <3FA072FB.9060906@cisco.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FA072FB.9060906@cisco.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-PGPkey: http://www.shrubbery.net/~heas/public-key.asc X-note: live free, or die! X-homer: awe, not the good cheek Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 06:10:03PM -0800, Forier Zhang: > the rancid running perfect with my Cisco GSR routers, but when I > upgraded the IOS to some latest version like 12.0(26.3)S, the do-diffs > or 'rancid router-name' stopped with error message says: > > 10.21.28.4: missed cmd(s): show install active > > after some debug I found that the problem maybe came with the 'show > version' output format in the new IOS versions, most likely it's the > lines as below: > > WARNING: Old fab-loader in slot 0; use "upgrade fabric-downloader" to update > WARNING: Old MBus agent ROM in some slots; use "upgrade mbus-agent-rom" > to update > > looks the current version (2.2.2) can not handle the ';' correctly. > of course, the problem gone after I did the upgrading as indicated in > the above warning messages. (they gone from the 'show version') > > does anyone there see this issue ? > > thanks ! This is more than likely trigger not by the ';' or anything else in those messages, but by how 2.2.2 parsed them, where by we tried to also collect the "suggested fix" that followed these warning. At some point in the recent past, Cisco (that's you :) dropped the suggestion text. If the last warning in the list had been one for which rancid tried to collect the "suggested fix", then it could have inadvertantly eaten the next command-line, which in 2.2.2 would be 'show install active', and resulted in it believing that the command had not be run properly. Hence, we have the following poised for 2.3: ---------------------------- revision 1.143 date: 2003/09/10 19:33:58; author: heas; state: Exp; lines: +0 -8 drop the "suggested action" portion of GSR LC/RP ROM upgrade warnings. Cisco keeps changing the format. ---------------------------- warning, I do not know if this will cleanly apply to 2.2.2. It might have to be wedged in manually. Index: rancid.in =================================================================== RCS file: /home/rancid/.CVS/rancid/bin/rancid.in,v retrieving revision 1.142 retrieving revision 1.143 diff -u -r1.142 -r1.143 --- rancid.in 23 Aug 2003 19:10:32 -0000 1.142 +++ rancid.in 10 Sep 2003 19:33:58 -0000 1.143 @@ -296,14 +296,6 @@ ProcessHistory("COMMENTS","keysort","I0","!\n"); } ProcessHistory("COMMENTS","keysort","I1","! $_"); - if (/Recommend RP/i) { - # RP Slot Warning is only single line - $_ = "\n"; - } else { - # The line after the WARNING is what to do about it. - $_ = ; tr/\015//d; - } - ProcessHistory("COMMENTS","keysort","I1","! $_"); } if (/^Configuration register is (.*)$/) { $config_register=$1; From owner-rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Thu Oct 30 21:19:14 2003 Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9ULJEN02589 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 21:19:14 GMT Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) id B2FD917CFD0; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 13:19:13 -0800 (PST) Delivered-To: rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 10007) id 92A0617D07D; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 13:19:13 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Received: from pangsit.kjoe.net (28-207.surfsnel.dsl.internl.net [145.99.207.28]) by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA39517CFCF for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 13:19:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from otter by pangsit.kjoe.net with local (Exim 4.24) id 1AFKCD-0001nr-DY; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 22:19:09 +0100 Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 22:19:09 +0100 To: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Cc: "Marco Davids (SARA)" Subject: Rancid problem with 'WARNING' in 'show version' Message-ID: <20031030211908.GA6918@pangsit> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Mailer: Mutt on Debian GNU/Linux sid X-Editor: vim X-Organisation: SURFnet bv X-Address: Radboudburcht, P.O. Box 19035, 3501 DA Utrecht, NL X-Phone: +31 302 305 305 X-Telefax: +31 302 305 329 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: Niels den Otter Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk Rancid (version 2.2.2) doesn't appear to handle lines that start with 'WARNING' during 'show version' well. Code says the following: # The line after the WARNING is what to do about it. $_ = ; tr/\015//d; ProcessHistory("COMMENTS","keysort","I1","! $_"); However on GSRs the warning is often given directly on the same line, eg. WARNING: Old MBus agent ROM in some slots; use "upgrade mbus-agent-rom" to update The $_ causes the next prompt line to be read and the next command 'show install active' never to be executed, which makes Rancid warn about unsuccesful attempts. Does anyone know if the warning really comes after the WARNING line sometimes? If so I guess an extra check is needed to see if the next line is the prompt line and to continue if so. -- Niels From owner-rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Thu Oct 30 21:37:27 2003 Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9ULbRN03087 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 21:37:27 GMT Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) id BD60717D0AA; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 13:37:26 -0800 (PST) Delivered-To: rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 10007) id A546B17D32E; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 13:37:26 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Received: from tower.partan.com (tower.partan.com [198.6.255.248]) by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45A1A17D0AA for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 13:37:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from tower.partan.com (localhost.partan.com [127.0.0.1]) by tower.partan.com (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h9ULbEgq026915; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 16:37:15 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from asp@tower.partan.com) Received: (from asp@localhost) by tower.partan.com (8.12.8p2/8.12.8/Submit) id h9ULbER5026912; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 16:37:14 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from asp) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 16:37:14 -0500 From: Andrew Partan To: Niels den Otter Cc: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net, "Marco Davids (SARA)" Subject: Re: Rancid problem with 'WARNING' in 'show version' Message-ID: <20031030213714.GA26869@partan.com> References: <20031030211908.GA6918@pangsit> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031030211908.GA6918@pangsit> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 10:19:09PM +0100, Niels den Otter wrote: > Rancid (version 2.2.2) doesn't appear to handle lines that start with > 'WARNING' during 'show version' well. Code says the following: > > # The line after the WARNING is what to do about it. > $_ = ; tr/\015//d; > ProcessHistory("COMMENTS","keysort","I1","! $_"); We removed this bit of code from the upcoming rancid 2.3 since cisco keeps mucking with it. See this message from yesterday on this same subject: From: john heasley To: Forier Zhang Cc: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Subject: Re: bug report---- missed cmd(s): show install active Message-ID: <20031030023823.GO13118@shrubbery.net> --asp From owner-rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Thu Oct 30 21:39:26 2003 Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9ULdQN03099 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 21:39:26 GMT Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) id 90D1B17D0AA; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 13:39:25 -0800 (PST) Delivered-To: rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 10007) id 6CB2817D32E; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 13:39:25 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Received: from pangsit.kjoe.net (28-207.surfsnel.dsl.internl.net [145.99.207.28]) by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 461BD17D0AA for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 13:39:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from otter by pangsit.kjoe.net with local (Exim 4.24) id 1AFKVj-0001oY-VM; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 22:39:19 +0100 Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 22:39:19 +0100 To: Andrew Partan Cc: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net, "Marco Davids (SARA)" Subject: Re: Rancid problem with 'WARNING' in 'show version' Message-ID: <20031030213919.GC5556@pangsit> References: <20031030211908.GA6918@pangsit> <20031030213714.GA26869@partan.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031030213714.GA26869@partan.com> X-Mailer: Mutt on Debian GNU/Linux sid X-Editor: vim X-Organisation: SURFnet bv X-Address: Radboudburcht, P.O. Box 19035, 3501 DA Utrecht, NL X-Phone: +31 302 305 305 X-Telefax: +31 302 305 329 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: Niels den Otter Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk Andrew, On Thursday, 30 October 2003, Andrew Partan wrote: > We removed this bit of code from the upcoming rancid 2.3 since cisco keeps > mucking with it. > > See this message from yesterday on this same subject: > From: john heasley > To: Forier Zhang > Cc: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net > Subject: Re: bug report---- missed cmd(s): show install active > Message-ID: <20031030023823.GO13118@shrubbery.net> I have missed that e-mail. Thanks for the quick response (and fix). -- Niels From owner-rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Thu Oct 30 21:55:44 2003 Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ni.shrubbery.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9ULtiN03493 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 21:55:44 GMT Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) id EA44517CFCF; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 13:55:43 -0800 (PST) Delivered-To: rancid-discuss-outgoing@shrubbery.net Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 10007) id C5F5A17CFD0; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 13:55:43 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 7053) id D5FEB17D07D; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 13:55:42 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 13:55:42 -0800 From: john heasley To: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Subject: Re: Rancid problem with 'WARNING' in 'show version' Message-ID: <20031030215542.GA25634@shrubbery.net> References: <20031030211908.GA6918@pangsit> <20031030213714.GA26869@partan.com> <20031030213919.GC5556@pangsit> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031030213919.GC5556@pangsit> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-PGPkey: http://www.shrubbery.net/~heas/public-key.asc X-note: live free, or die! X-homer: awe, not the good cheek Sender: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Precedence: bulk Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 10:39:19PM +0100, Niels den Otter: > Andrew, > > On Thursday, 30 October 2003, Andrew Partan wrote: > > We removed this bit of code from the upcoming rancid 2.3 since cisco keeps > > mucking with it. > > > > See this message from yesterday on this same subject: > > From: john heasley > > To: Forier Zhang > > Cc: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net > > Subject: Re: bug report---- missed cmd(s): show install active > > Message-ID: <20031030023823.GO13118@shrubbery.net> > > I have missed that e-mail. Thanks for the quick response (and fix). > I created a patch for this which will apply cleanly to 2.2.2. hope this helps folks. ftp://ftp.shrubbery.net/pub/rancid/rancid-2.2.2.p3