[rancid] git vs svn

[Ugo Bellavance]

I personally think that implementing a remote copy of the repo with git is
a big plus. We're currently using SVN but I'd like to make the move.

On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 2:16 PM john heasley <heas at shrubbery.net> wrote:

> Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 01:20:37PM +0000, Wayne Eisenberg:
> > I'm considering changing over to git from svn for my rancid version
> control. A brief Google search seems to show that converting from one to
> the other is not terribly difficult. (So I don't have to lose my history.)
> >
> > For those who are using git with rancid, what has the experience been
> like? Worth doing? Stay with SVN? Doesn't really matter?
>
> I use all three - IMO, religion.  git is slightly easier to implement a
> remote
> copy of the repo.  both are much faster than cvs.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rancid-discuss mailing list
> Rancid-discuss at shrubbery.net
> http://www.shrubbery.net/mailman/listinfo/rancid-discuss
>


-- 
Ugo Bellavance (ugob at lubik.ca)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.shrubbery.net/pipermail/rancid-discuss/attachments/20191214/b12fc0e6/attachment.htm>